Two Dangerous Ideologies | New NY 23rd

On April 28,2022, Heather Cox Richardson discussed  “two right-wing, antidemocratic ideologies.” About the first she wrote:

One is pushed by Texas governor Greg Abbott, who is embracing a traditional American states’ rights approach to attack the active federal government that has expanded equality since World War II. The Trump years put the states’ rights ideology of the Confederacy on steroids, first to justify destroying business regulation, social welfare legislation, and international diplomacy, and then to absolve the federal government from responsibility for combating the coronavirus pandemic. Then, of course, the January 6 insurrection saw state legislatures refusing to accept the results of a federal election and rioters carrying the Confederate flag into the United States Capitol. 

About the second she wrote:

The other new ideology at work is in the hands of Florida governor Ron DeSantis, who, as Beauchamp pointed out, is trying to recreate Orbánism in the U.S. Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has eroded Hungary’s democracy since he took power for the second time, about a decade ago. Orbán has been open about his determination to overthrow the concept of western democracy, replacing it with what he has, on different occasions, called “illiberal democracy” or “Christian democracy.” He wants to replace the equality at the heart of democracy with religious nationalism. 

The first ideology, asserting “states rights” to head off federal legislation he opposes, describes Tom Reed fairly well. Of course Tom only asserts states rights when it suits him. However Tom was at least wishy-washy on public health measures, did accept the results of the 2020 election, and decried the Jan. 6th insurrection.

Rep. Tenney, who possibly still seeks to succeed Tom Reed in office, surely adheres to the first ideology: she generally opposes most public health measures and many regulations.

Neither Tom Reed nor Claudia Tenney, both Trump supporters, would likely agree with the second ideology. However, Richardson concludes:

Trump’s type of family autocracy is hard to replicate right now, and our history has given us the knowledge and tools to defend democracy in the face of the ideology of states’ rights. But the rise of “illiberal democracy” or “soft fascism” is new to us, and the first step toward rolling it back is recognizing that it is different from Trump’s autocracy or states’ rights, and that its poison is spreading in the United States. 

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Two Dangerous Ideologies | New NY 23rd

Free Speech Under Threat | New NY 23rd

For all the tolerance and enlightenment that modern society claims, Americans are losing hold of a fundamental right as citizens of a free country: the right to speak their minds and voice their opinions in public without fear of being shamed or shunned. – The Editorial Board

On Sunday, March 29, The New York Times published an editorial titled “Free Speech is Under Threat.” In brief, the authors claim that the public’s freedom to speak freely has diminished. The article uses polls to buttress that claim.

The first question was “How much of a problem is it that some Americans do not exercise their freedom of speech in everyday situation out of fear of retaliation or harsh criticism?” The results show that 80% of the respondents agree that this is a problem. The question was poorly written; it suggests the answer that the poll-takers expected. It might better have been “If some Americans do not exercise their freedom of speech in everyday situation out of fear of retaliation or harsh criticism, is that a problem?” Still, the response is surprising.

The article discusses both online speech and other forums. These are different: online speech is anonymous, impersonal, raucous; almost anything goes. The authors write: “social media is awash in speech of the point-scoring, picking-apart, piling-on, put-down variety.” Speech in public is more likely to be civil.

I found “without fear of being shamed or shunned,” in the quote above, puzzling. I have been attacked at public meetings, but was mostly ashamed that my words could be so twisted. Shunned is often associated with religious groups which expel a nonconforming member. I don’t know what groups might shun one for public speech. Another reason given for fear is “retaliation and harsh criticism.” A reasonable fear of retaliation might well make one keep quiet, harsh criticism not so much. Surprisingly, half of the respondents claimed to have held their tongue in the past year out of fear of retaliation or harsh criticism.

I would be most willing to express controversial views at a political forum, not so much at church, workplace, or a family dinner. More than any fear, it would have been pointless and futile in those situations. I didn’t often want to hear political views, particularly the second-hand views of talk show pundits, at work.

The editorial discusses limits to free speech. There is a dilemma: limiting speech spreading disinformation could justify restrictive legislation. The authors write:

Free speech is predicated on mutual respect — that of people for one another and of a government for the people it serves. 

Often the predicate of mutual respect and respect for our government is false.

The editorial board plans to identify a wide range of threats to freedom of speech in the coming months and to offer possible solutions. I am looking forward to that.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Free Speech Under Threat | New NY 23rd

Joe Sempolinski | New NY 23rd

 A Member . . . [or an] officer, or employee of the House [paid at or above the “senior staff” rate], may not –(d)  serve for compensation as an officer or member of the board of an association, corporation, or other entity; —House Rule … Continue reading

Posted in Congress, Economics, Environmental, Ethics, Legislation, Political Tagged Joe Sempolinski, Nick Langworthy, NY-23, Tom Reed

The Chautauqua County League of Women Voters sponsored a Campaign Forum on August 18. Reportedly, about 50 people attended. Here is a report on it. This brief report mentions inflation and firearm regulations as subjects discussed. You can listen to … Continue reading

Posted in Campaigning, Congress, Political Tagged Chautauqua County League of Women Voters., firearm regulation, inflation, Joe Sempolinski, Max Della Pia

The candidates are Max Della Pia and Joseph Sempolinski. Max Della Pia: “Right now, Congress is broken. As a nation, we need to focus on what brings us together as Americans rather than what pulls us apart.” — Campaign mailing … Continue reading

Posted in Campaigning, Congress, Political Tagged Joe Sempolinski, Max Della Pia, NY-23, Special Election

I will never apologize for American values. There is no America without our values, and I will always fight to uphold them.–Joe Sempolinski, facebook, Aug. 2nd. I will never stop fighting to represent the conservative principles and stand for the … Continue reading

Posted in Congress, Political Tagged Constitution, Joe Sempolinski, NY-23, Special Election Aug. 23rd, values

NY-23 Special Election, Aug 23, 2003. The Democratic Party candidate is Max Della Pia. The Republican Party candidate is Joe Sempolinski. Max is also running in the November General Election, Joe is not. Joe’s view from his website: Joe is … Continue reading

Posted in Congress, Gun Violence, Political Tagged guns, Joe Sempolinski, Max Della Pia, NY-23, Second Amendment, Special Election Aug. 23rd

I will stand for our constitutional, conservative values and stop the left from forcing their radical agenda on the people of America.–Joe Sempolinski, July 21, facebook Joe Sempolinski, the Republican Candidate for Congress in the NY-23rd special election, claims to … Continue reading

Posted in Congress, Constitution, Political Tagged Conservative, Joe Sempolinski, NY-23, Special Election Aug. 23rd

NY-23 Special Election, Aug 23, 2003. The Democratic Party candidate is Max Della Pia. The Republican Party candidate is Joe Sempolinski. Max is also running in the November General Election, Joe is not. Joe’s view from his website: Joe is … Continue reading

Posted in Congress, Health Care, Political Tagged Joe Sempolinski, Max Della Pia, NY-23, Special Election Aug. 23rd

NY-23 Special Election, Aug 23, 2003. The Democratic Party candidate is Max Della Pia. The Republican Party candidate is Joe Sempolinski. Max is also running in the November General Election, Joe is not. ~~~ Max’s issues (from his website): Equal … Continue reading

Posted in Congress, Political, Uncategorized Tagged Joe Sempolinski, Max Della Pia, NY-23, Special Election Aug. 23rd

Shadowbanning blocks comments from being seen by some, possibly all, users. A person posting a comment, seeing it, may not realize it is blocked from being seen by others. Joe Sempolinski is running in the NY-23 special election. He posts … Continue reading

Posted in Campaigning Tagged 2022, facebook, Joe Sempolinski, shadowban

Candidate Max Della Pia Joe Sempolinski Dates 01/01/2022 to 03/31/2022 04/29/2021 to 03/31/2022 Receipts $15,070 $199,335 From Individuals $15,070 $146,729 From Family 0 $33,500 (approximately) Loans 0 $30,000 From Committees 0 $16,466 Disbursements $268 $52,488 Cash on hand $14,802 $146,847 … Continue reading

Posted in Campaign Finances Tagged 2022, Joe Sempolinski, Max Della Pia

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Joe Sempolinski | New NY 23rd

Net Neutrality | New NY 23rd

Today, the FCC voted along party lines to end Net Neutrality, scrapping regulations meant to keep the Internet fair and open to all. This decision re-categorizes the Internet as an information service instead of a utility. The FCC’s decision was not a surprise, despite widespread opposition from consumers.--Tracy Mitrano

I don’t understand the internet. I know I pay Time Warner Cable for internet service. I suppose their revenue pays for maintaining local cable connections, for computer equipment, and for access to the internet backbone of tier 1 carriers like ATT and Verizon. Whether internet communications are profitable for tier 1 carriers or not, I have no idea.

The basic idea of net neutrality is equal service for all internet users. I don’t know if the net neutrality regulation affected business practices, or whether the repeal of these regulations will spark change. Some fear that providers will sell premium service to some to the detriment of others.

In The Atlantic, Ian Bogost writes:

In truth, nobody yet knows how the net-neutrality rollback will affect anyone—consumers, telcos, big tech, or start-ups. Internet zealots warn of widespread blocking and throttling, not to mention pay-for-play fast lanes that might benefit big companies like Netflix and Google and prevent upstarts from enjoying innovation and growth. ISPs, aware of how hot the issue is, will likely take no immediate action.

There is much more to digest in this article.

Leonid Bershidsky, writing in Bloomberg, notes:

 If current market participants get too greedy and start doing things that displease customers, they will create an opportunity for new entrants who won’t do that. I doubt the repeal of the 2015 rules will boost the number of internet providers in middle America — but it’s possible that the threat of disruption will stop existing ISPs from worsening their current offerings.

My conclusion is that the question of net neutrality is complicated, that public vigilance is vital in protecting the public interest, and that the matter is too important to be determined by industry lobbyists.

The article on Estonia explains what might be a better way forward.

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/12/net-neutrality-was-never-enough/548549/

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-12-15/don-t-be-afraid-of-the-net-neutrality-repeal

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/18/estonia-the-digital-republic

This entry was posted in Trump and tagged Internet, net neutrality, Tracy Mitrano. Bookmark the permalink.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Net Neutrality | New NY 23rd

What’s conservative? | New NY 23rd

Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged. — Northwest Ordinance of 1787 inscribed on Angell Hall at the University of Michigan

  • Small, ineffective government
  • Support for autocrats: Putin, Kim, MBS
  • Ballooning budget deficits
  • Low taxes for the wealthy
  • Low taxes on inherited wealth
  • Excessive military spending
  • Any danger from climate change is negligible
  • Ignore the “Emoluments clause”
  • Judges presumed to be biased in favor of “conservative views”
  • Judges expected to put corporate interests ahead of human interests
  • Veterans homeless and hungry after their service
  • Healthcare unaffordable for many
  • Seniors with inadequate pensions
  • Attacks on public education
  • Private prisons
  • Border walls
  • Political assassinations
  • others?

If these are conservative, are they what we need and want? Really?

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on What’s conservative? | New NY 23rd

Candidates’ Last Interviews | New NY 23rd

Reporter Vaughn Golden interviewed the five NY23rd Congressional Candidates on Saturday (June 23, 2018). Here are the videos of each interview. Each are about 30 minutes long.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Candidates’ Last Interviews | New NY 23rd

Militarism | New NY 23rd

We have the greatest military in the world…We have given them total authorization…If you look at what’s happened over the last eight weeks and compare that really with what’s happened over the last eight years, you’ll see there’s a tremendous difference. Tremendous difference.–President Donald Trump

Yes, I see a tremendous difference, but nothing to celebrate: War was not the answer in Korea or Vietnam. It wasn’t the answer in Afghanistan or Iraq. It isn’t the answer today in Afghanistan, Korea or Syria.

  • Korea: War in Korea had reached a stalemate. President Eisenhower insisted on a ceasefire which ended the killing. During more than 50 years of relative peace, South Korea at least has prospered.
  • Vietnam: Recall the “domino theory?” We had to fight and win in Vietnam or the whole of SE Asia would be “lost.” We abandoned the war, peace and prosperity followed. The “domino theory” was bunk.
  • Afghanistan: The Russians tried to tame Afghanistan by establishing a proxy government there; they failed. GWB thought he could win cheap by supporting a faction known as the “Northern Alliance;” that led to years of inconclusive war there. President Obama then worked to reduce US involvement in Afghanistan. Can a return to active participation in war there be wise?
  • Iraq: We fought in Iraq; one unsatisfactory government was replaced with another. Conflict continues there.
  • Syria: The Obama Administration resisted pressure to intervene in the Syrian Civil war other than to give limited support to those battling ISIS. The political situation in Syria is complex. Our goal ought to be to seek a ceasefire and political settlement in Syria, not to widen the war there.
  • Korea again:  What good could possibly come from war in Korea even if it caused the rapid collapse of the North Korean government? What would be the cost? What is our exit strategy? What might the Koreans do to thwart our plans?

Nuclear weapons are a threat to life on Earth. There is nothing extraordinary about Korea or Iran that sets them clearly apart from India, Pakistan, Israel, Britain, France, Russia, China, or the USA. Rather than threaten war, we should work for peace and the elimination of these weapons in every country.

Donald Trump is like Sleeping Beauty–waking up after 50 years in dreamland, knowing nothing, with no experience in government, he assiduously sets out to retry mistakes of the past. He needs good advice, but instead relies on his equally naive children.

“Total authorization” is militarism–there is good reason for civilian control of the military. Senior military officers surely know that guns and bombs are no cure for terrorism and insurgency. Civilian officials in the Trump Administration ought to recognize that as well.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Militarism | New NY 23rd

Tom Reed’s contradictions | New NY 23rd

“We care about our senior citizens and those living on fixed incomes.  That is why we have repeatedly called for a review of the Social Security Cost of Living Adjustment formula. It needs to be modified to reflect the realities of rising healthcare costs among other challenges that our seniors face. They paid into the system their entire working lives. It’s not fair that retirees are forced to try to stretch their benefits even further.”–Tom Reed

“Addressing an issue pertinent to his audience, Reed told the crowd gathered in the large community room that with his position on the Ways and Means Committee, he would work to make sure Social Security and Medicare stay for generations to come, even if it means people would have to work longer or get less.”

Tom Reed’s political views are rife with contradictions. Here are examples:

  • He complains that Social Security benefits are too low, but told seniors he would cut benefits to “save” Social Security.
  • Trusted by Republican leaders, he was rewarded by appointment to the House Ways and Means Committee, yet he poses as a political outsider.
  • His job is to represent us in Washington, yet he brags that he spends as little time there as he can.
  • Before he was elected to Congress, he favored term limits. Now he says he will stay till the “job is done” with no end in sight. According to Disney, Davy Crockett needed only one term to do what Tom hasn’t begun after three terms.
  • He claims to be a fiscal conservative, yet he spends much more public money on partisan mailings than the average of his peers.
  • He claims expertise in energy policy, manufacturing, power plant sighting, agriculture, and other areas in which he has no education or experience.
  • He feigns concern over violence directed at women, yet continues to support Donald Trump.
  • His job is to legislate, yet he supports Donald Trump who he says will disrupt government presumably including the legislative process.

These contradictions may not be liabilities–Tom’s supporters may see what they want to see and ignore the rest.

https://reed.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/reed-issues-statement-regarding-social-security-cola

http://www.salamancapress.com/news/reed-talks-health-care-goals-with-elderly/article_e8eb2aba-9d11-11e6-8009-c33d92525376.html

http://www.pressconnects.com/story/news/local/2016/10/11/reeds-spending-mailings-nearly-double-average/91867530/

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Tom Reed’s contradictions | New NY 23rd

In support of John Plumb | New NY 23rd

    This opinion piece was written by Jim Carr, Chair of the Chemung County Democratic Committee. Jim has also offered this to many NY 23rd newspapers.

I am writing to support John Plumb in his bid to represent us in the United States House of Representatives.   John is from the town of Randolph which is near Jamestown . His family has lived there for several generations. John left the area to attend college via an ROTC scholarship. He then protected his country for the following 20 years in the US Navy as a  submarine Commander. . John, retired from the NAVY but continues as a reservist.

Prior to his return to Randolph,  he worked in Washington, DC as a staff member in the National Security Council.  His opponent, Tom Reed, has run misleading negative attack adds against  John inferring that he is a Washington insider and not interested in the Southern Tier. I view this from a different angle in that  serving in the military is patriotic and having experience in national security is a strong asset for one who is representing us especially given all the security risks at this time.  Since his return to western New York is where his family resides and his sister teaches. He has recently married.  All this makes me think he has strong ties to this area.

John is committed to dealing effectively with the drug abuse problems in our area.  However, he views this as both a legal and public health issue with lots of overlap. Deaths from opioid overdose is  45% higher in our rural communities than in urban areas. This is a complex problem with a need for careful planning vs. knee jerk reactions. John Plumb knows that we have become comfortable with overprescribing and usages of opioids for pain management. Unlike Congressman Reed, John Plumb is not beholden to drug companies or their lobbyists and therefore, can  challenge how we approach pain management.

Tom Reed has given his support to the passage of the HELP Act (misleading name) which would allow the possibility of the death penalty for anyone selling heroin laced with fentanyl.   John Barry Executive Director of Southern Tier AIDS Program, said in the Star Gazette(10/19/16) that this bill would continue to drive drug use underground with devastating results (spread of HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis C). Often, sellers are users and need rehabilitation in addition to facing legal consequences.    In addition, the death penalty is not legal in New York State.  Did Mr.Reed, our representative to Washington, forget this fact?

Mr. Plumb supports  quality  education and is a strong supporter of universal pre-school which evens the playing field for youth from all backgrounds thus we increasing the odds that more children will graduate to college or a trade school. Mr. Plumb believes we should protect the GI Bill and study this program to provide similar programs for those serving our country at home.

In terms of the environment and energy, Mr. Plumb recognizes the need to diversify our energy supply.  We must have reliable energy sources as we transition to new technologies.  Until we can do that he believes we must develop new technologies to reduce emissions on our current energy sources. .

Finally, for me the most important asset is that John Plumb, a military man, believes diplomatic solutions need to be ahead of military ones in our desire to help other nations, protect our interests and, promote respect among nations.

I urge voters to take the time to go to: www.John PlumbforCogress.com and learn more about him.  Then vote November 8th JOHN PlUMB for Congress!

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on In support of John Plumb | New NY 23rd

New York’s Congressional Districts 2022 | New NY 23rd

New NY-24

I am surprised at the new congressional districts defined by the court. I expected they would be more compact and competitive.

  • The new districts are much the same as before, at least in upstate New York.
  • NY-24 is anything but compact.
  • Few districts are competitive.
  • NY-20 D+14
  • NY-25 D+13
  • NY-26 D+18
  • NY-21 R+17
  • NY-23 R+23
  • NY-24 R+22

Rather than making most congressional elections more competitive, the new districts seem designed to preserve the minority party’s representation. NY-23 went from R+15 to R+23. The old map gave Republicans four safe seats in upstate NY with three up for grabs. The new map gives Republicans three safe seats in upstate NY with three closely matched.

The fivethirtyeight article allows one to compare the old and new districts.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/redistricting-2022-maps/new-york/

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on New York’s Congressional Districts 2022 | New NY 23rd