NY23’s Sample Ballots for the Sept 13 NYS Primaries | New NY 23rd

There will be a State Primary Election on Thursday, September 13.  Only Democratic and Reform Parties will have State-Wide Races. The Democratic, Republican, Conservative and some minor parties may have local races depending on which Senate or Assembly District, County, City, Village or Town you live in.

Please note the those voters who are not in a political party (Unaffiliated voters) CAN VOTE IN THE REFORM PARTY PRIMRY! Here are sample ballots as published by the County Board of Elections offices:

Basic State Democratic Ballot:

Basic State Reform/Unaffiliated Ballot:

Allegany County sample ballots are not available on-line.

Link to Cattaraugus County’s sample ballots click here

Link to Chautauqua County’s sample ballots click here

Link to Chemung County’s Ballots click here. — It has been reported that the ballots on tis site are out of date. You can follow this link to see the Chemung’s list of Candidates.

Link to Ontario County’s sample ballots click here.

Link to Schuyler County’s List of Candidates click here.

Link to Seneca County’s sample ballots click here

Link to Steuben County’s sample ballots click here.

Link to Tompkins County’s sample ballots click here

Link to Tioga County’s sample ballots click here.

Link to Yates County’s sample ballots click here.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on NY23’s Sample Ballots for the Sept 13 NYS Primaries | New NY 23rd

Television | New NY 23rd

My dad once was a television engineer in the days of vacuum tubes and CRT displays. He had burns on the inside of his arms from brushing against hot tubes and scrapes on the outside from jerking his arm out.

In those days we had antennas with rotators–you could get a few channels if you pointed the antenna at the station. If the signal was weak the picture was snowy. What we saw on the screen was what you would have seen in the studio from the perspective of the camera operator. If there was no program, there might be a test pattern which could be used to judge display resolution. If the station was off the air, there was snow. If one channel was off the air, others would be on.

Then we got cable. The cable brought the TV signal to the home with better quality than an antenna. There were more channels, but you had to pay. The old TV still worked; it was no big deal.

Now we have digital TV. I am not an expert. I had to buy a new set–the old one which worked fine after many years was now obsolete. The new TV gets signals from the internet. When the internet is slow, the picture is distorted. I have not seen a test pattern, but I’m not impressed with the picture quality. Sometimes I see a blank screen with a “loading” message. When the news host asks a question, there is a delay before the expert responds. The expert is often not in the studio with the host even though one might think so.

I pay for internet service and for a Spectrum  TV application. The TV application gets me many channels in which I have no interest; it also gets me Spectrum ads. This seems wrong–why should I pay Spectrum to see their ads? It angers me to hear how wonderful they claim their service is. Sometimes I see the “loading” message during the Spectrum ads. The ads tell me that Spectrum internet service is “crazy fast.” That seems to be a lie.

Cable TV was independent of the internet. Fast or slow, my internet service was unaffected by the TV being on or off. Now my internet service slows to a crawl when the TV is on. I plan to try a faster ethernet link to the router and modem–I hope that will help.

I own the cable modem. I bought it when Time Warner started to charge rent for their modem. My modem used to work fine; perhaps now it is too slow.

TV used to be simple and reliable ; now in my opinion much less so. We once expected to see advertising since TV reception was free. Now we pay for it and see more advertising than program content. Many of the ads are offensive. I miss for the good old days of TV–Ed Sullivan, Lawrence Welk, “I Love Lucy;” even maybe “Brady Bunch” or  “Lost in Space.”

This entry was posted in Education and tagged Spectrum, Television, Time Warner. Bookmark the permalink.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Television | New NY 23rd

Infrastructure | New NY 23rd

Our Greatest Threat is our National Debt.–Rep. Tom Reed

This fake proposal  (Trump’s) will not address the serious infrastructure needs facing this country, so our potholed roads will get worse, our bridges and transit systems will become more dangerous, and our tolls will become higher. Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR)

Rep. Tom Reed/Problem Solvers President Trump Reference
We must fulfill our duty
to provide stable, long-term funding … while also encouraging innovative financing …
generate $1.5 trillion (actually, Federal funding would be cut and no new money appropriated) Problem Solvers/The Hill
Congress must also cut red tape and stop gridlock when it prevents projects from moving forward in as expedient a manner as possible … streamline the permitting process down to two years
We need a national commitment to ensure that every American can connect to the internet, and that commitment needs to be on the

same order as our country’s commitment to rural electrification in the 1930s.

invest in rural infrastructure projects
advance workforce training.
  • Local matching funds could come from sales or property taxes or user fees.–Bart Jansen, USA Today
  • Lawmakers seem more interested in rural broadband than potholes.
  • Surprisingly, the Problem Solvers hint at support for increasing the tax on gasoline (called gas user fee), long opposed by Rep. Tom Reed.
  • Interestingly, Rural Electrification was often done by Rural Electric Cooperatives, part of “The New Deal,” disparaged by some as socialism.

http://thehill.com/policy/transportation/373357-white-house-to-propose-15-trillion-infrastructure-proposal

Click to access psc_infrastructure_report.pdf

http://www.thv11.com/news/nation-world/trump-unveils-15-trillion-infrastructure-plan-proposes-cuts-to-other-federal-programs/517450218

This entry was posted in Congress, Political, Reed’s Views, Trump and tagged infrastructure. Bookmark the permalink.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Infrastructure | New NY 23rd

Living Without Regulations | New NY 23rd

We all probably know Snow Birds that leave the NY 23rd in the winter for warmer climates, mainly to Florida, Arizona, Texas or California. Two friends of mine have been going further south for their three month winter hiatus. This years they are in Panama, and recently have spent winters in Honduras, Mexico, Cambodia, Viet Nam and others. Here is a recent email I received from them.

Rich,

Republican denial of global warming shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone.  It’s consistent with their centuries long limited agenda (strong military. small government, family values) and steadfast denial of any aspect of REALITY that conflicts with it.

I’ve been to 25+ countries.  Am presently in Panama.  and EVERY trip I’ve made has made me grateful for US government.  Do these Republican ideologist imagine that the traffic regulations, sanitation stipulations, electrical codes, safety guidelines, etc, which make life in the United States both safer and better,  place exist on their own?  They exist because of government which created and enforces them.

I thank big government every day I’m in the United States of America.

Hope you’re doing well.  HOT here.  91 in afternoon and 86 now.

Going to see part of Panama Canal tomorrow.

Rick

I understand that being against regulations is good political rallying point aimed against the Democrats. Rep. Tom Reed has 31 Press Releases on his website that discusses regulations uses phrases like “costly regulations”, “this legislation will reduce  regulations”,  “over regulation has a disproportionately negative impact”, “reducing onerous regulations“, “If this regulation is left in place it may have crippling effects.”

Yes, no one likes to be told what to do, but there are reasons for regulations. Reed’s comments deal with the clean air act, agriculture, light bulbs, business operations, infrastructure, waterways, property rights, wood stoves, Chesapeake Watershed requirements, health services and other topics.  To be fair, Rep. Reed is working with other Upstate New York representatives to tighten the pilot flight and duty time regulation, since that was the cause of the Flight 3407  crashed outside of Buffalo on February 12, 2009.

New York State has the reputation of being over-regulating. The news of the Flint, Michigan’s poisonous water reminds us how grateful we should be to have the New York State Department of Health and their strict regulations. Hearing that the Flint School District  has one school nurse in their school system. Secretaries, with little if any health training,  passes out the medicine for the students. What a way to save money.

The 2013 Fertilizer Explosion in West, Texas, which killed 15,  was caused because the company failed to safely store the chemicals in its stockpile, and that federal, state and local regulations about the handling of hazardous materials were inadequate. Remember that Timothy McVeigh used fertilizer when he blew up Federal Building in Oklahoma.

The factory in West, Texas had a history of disobeying regulations. They were fined in 1985 for mishandling storage requirements, 2006 for failing to file a required risk management plan, and 2011 for not having a required storage plan. They had other minor citations.

According to a Huffington Post article:

Texas prides itself on the lack of rules for businesses. Texas is the only state that doesn’t require companies to have workers compensation insurance. Houston is one of the few cities that have no zoning laws to create buffers between schools, homes and toxic chemical manufactures.  Texas doesn’t have a state fire code and prohibits small counties from having local codes allowing fire marshals to inspect and prohibit the storage of highly flammable and explosive chemicals near homes and schools. According to the New York Times, some Texas counties even cite the lack of local fire codes as a reason for companies to move there.

We have elected leaders who promote regulations as un-American. Lobbyists’ donations fine their way to those representatives.  They conveniently question the science research that  would lead to costly safety innovations, therefore reducing profits. Guess which way those representatives vote.

Lacking regulations might be good for industries by bringing jobs to your neighborhood or state, but they are harmful to the workers of the unregulated plants. Industrial nations have the responsibility to protect their workers, and neighbors of the industrial plants (including homes, schools, and other businesses) from profit-making (non-accidental) accidents.

The quality of life differences between the United States and third world countries (Panama, Honduras, Mexico, Cambodia, Viet Nam, for example) can be attributed to many factors. The differences of regulations is one those factors. . Our standards are envied by people of other nations. Have you noticed there has not been a mass migration out of the USA to third world (few regulations) countries?

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Living Without Regulations | New NY 23rd

Rep. Capuano (D-MA) on Immigration Policy | New NY 23rd

Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, issued two Memoranda, ‘Implementing the President’s Border Security’ and ‘Immigration Enforcement Improvements Policies and Enforcement of the Immigration Laws to Serve the National Interest.’  These documents appear to have been written with greater care than the President’s January 27th Executive Order on refugee admissions, which court action has stayed.  It is not yet clear what the courts will do with regard to these memos.

I do not object, and I think no reasonable person could object, to an effort to secure our borders, to establish “operational control” of entry into the United States.  Nor could one object to the deportation of aliens convicted of crimes or found to have made fraudulent claims for asylum.

These memos, however, propose extreme measures to achieve questionable ends.  Their purpose is to deny entry to many migrants and speed the deportation of many others.  Persons apprehended at the southern border will be detained or sent back to Mexico, whether or not they are citizens of Mexico.  It’s important to note that Mexico is under no obligation to accept someone who is not a Mexican citizen.  So this process will require the cooperation of Mexico, a country which the Administration has consistently antagonized.

This will also require the construction of vast new detention facilities for which no cost estimates are yet available.  DHS foresees the hiring of 5500 new agents for Customs and Border Protection, and 10,000 new agents for Immigration and Customs Enforcement.  There are no cost estimates for all of that additional federal hiring either. Moreover, and more troubling, President Obama’s Priorities Enforcement Program targeting convicted felons, terrorists and gang members is explicitly ended. I fear that limited resources may be wasted on apprehending immigrants who pose no danger to any community.

The memos reinstate a program that many urban mayors and police chiefs object to: it enlists state and local law enforcement officers as what Secretary Kelly calls “force multipliers” to investigate, arrest, and detain any undocumented person with whom they come in contact.  This could apply to someone who witnesses a murder or a woman seeking a restraining order to protect her US citizen children from an abusive father.

The memos vastly increase the number of people who could be deported without due process. “Expedited removal” has previously been applied to aliens apprehended within 100 air miles of the border who had been in the United States for two weeks or less.  “Expedited removal” is now in effect everywhere in the United States for people who cannot affirmatively prove two years residence here.  Courts may note that the Fourth and Fifth Amendments refer to “persons” rather than, more narrowly, to citizens.

Aliens claiming asylum will still be accorded “credible fear” hearings, but the memo states that some will be sent to Mexico until those hearings can be scheduled.   The asylum officer must assess the credibility of the applicant’s fear of persecution or torture but must also consider the “statistical likelihood” that the claim will be upheld on review by the Department of Justice.  The memos aren’t clear what exactly this means. “Statistical likelihood” on the basis of what sample group?    Will asylum seekers be comparted to others from the same continent or nation of origin, or of the same gender, or religion?

The memos express concern for the safety of unaccompanied minors and propose to prosecute as “human traffickers” parents who pay intermediaries to bring their children to the United States. The good news for children is that DACA, the deferred action program for “Dreamers,” remains intact. So far.

https://www.dhs.gov/publication/implementing-presidents-border-security-and-immigration-enforcement-improvement-policies

https://www.dhs.gov/publication/enforcement-immigration-laws-serve-national-interest

This entry was posted in Congress, Immigration, Political and tagged Rep. Capuano. Bookmark the permalink.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Rep. Capuano (D-MA) on Immigration Policy | New NY 23rd

How Republican is the NY-23rd? | New NY 23rd

After Nate Shinagawa almost defeated Tom Reed in 2012, NY-23rd democrats hopefully looked forward to the next election. Then, in 2014, the anti-SAFE Act energy sparked the intensity of the GOP voters, and dampened Democratic voters’ spirits. In 2016 the Trump Campaign had the same effect. In both elections, many voters of the other parties, or not in any party (aka “Blanks”) were either caught up with the anti-SAFE/Trump bandwagon, or, sat home on election night.

These elections gave NY23rd-ers reasons to feel overwhelmed by republicans. Yes, there are more Republican voters than Democratic voters in our district, but the difference might not as large as some people think. The chart below show the number of voters registered for each party (or no party) as of November 1 2017. (note:the Other Parties include Green, Working Families, Women Equality Party, and Reform Parties). As you can see,  Republicans have just over  5% more voters than the Democrats.

Is it difficult to overcome a 5.2% enrollment deficit?

It’s not easy to overcome a 5.2% enrollment deficit, but it is not impossible.

Let me take you back to 2008.

Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chemung, Schuyler, Yates, and parts of Monroe and Ontario Counties made up the NY-29 Congressional District. Registered Republicans were 42.1% of the voters; Democrats had 30.4%.  Even with more than an 11% disadvantage, Democrat Eric Mass defeated incumbent Republican Randy Kuhl, 51% to 49% (5,330 votes). Of course the 2008 election and the 2018 election are not parallel; It was Massa’s second time he ran against Kuhl and the Democratic community was super-motivated since they wanted to replace Bush with Obama. But the fact is  democrats overcame a 11% voter disadvantage in 2008; they can overcome a 5.2% disadvantage in 2018.

There is no question that since the 2016 election, voter intensity  has shifted from the Republicans to the Democrats. Both parties need to convince the unaffiliated  (“Blank”) voters and those in the Independence Party  (and others–Green, Working Families, Women Equality Party, Conservative and Reform Parties) to vote for them in order to win. In other words, for the Democratic nominee for Congress to win in November, their campaign and supporters need to work hard to get their party voters, as well as a majority of the other voters, engaged and to the polls.

The first step is getting a large number of voters to the June 26 Democratic Primary. The voters are more apt to participate in the Primary if they are well-informed about the  candidates.

We can still register new voters for the Primary. June 1 is the last day for new voters to register to vote in person at the County’s Board of Elections. It is also the last day to mail  a voter registration form and it must be received by Board of Elections by June 6.

Winning in November will not be easy, but it is not impossible.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on How Republican is the NY-23rd? | New NY 23rd

Wither the GOP | New NY 23rd

Arthur Ahrens of Branchport is the author of this article which is published here with permission. Views expressed by contributors are their own.

Traditionally, the run-up to a convention sees a party attempting to tame rival factions and unite around a dynamic vision for the future. Instead, Republicans have spent the summer in a self-immolating downward spiral. — Tim Alberta, Politico Magazine

A party’s platform is the document in which the Party states its principles and what it stands for. In the past the Republican platform has made clear it stands for the rule of law, free markets, fair and simple taxes, religious freedom, home ownership, entrepreneurship, the Second Amendment, banning abortion, fair elections, and much more.

No longer. In 2020, the Republican Party states that it has no principles, at all. With the exception of enthusiastic support for Trump. No rule of law, free markets, taxes or anything. It has wholly become a party of personality. The Party of Trump.

The Republican Party is Dead. The Trump Party is alive and well.

About the platform:

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/08/republican-national-committee-2020-platform-trump.html

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/08/republicans-declare-their-2020-platform-is-to-support-whatever-trump-wants-to-do.html

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/republicans-to-forego-party-platform-in-favor-of-full-support-for-trumps-agenda-2020-08-23

About the future of the Republican Party:

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/08/24/republicanmeltdown-trump-convention-400039

This entry was posted in 2020, Campaigning, Congress, President, Trump and tagged GOP Platform. Bookmark the permalink.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Wither the GOP | New NY 23rd

The State of the District: NY-23 | New NY 23rd

We recently hosted a town hall in Chemung with Nucor employees on the positive impact of tax reform. Already we are starting to see the positive impact of tax reform. More than 200 companies have announced bonuses and wage increases. The meeting at Nucor highlighted how tax reform will positively impact the manufacturing industry and create jobs in NY-23.

My RAMI bill has also led to the creation of uncounted, hi-tech, high-paying jobs in Western NY. Sadly, Albany’s tax and spend policies, favored by Gov. Cuomo and his fellow Democrats, extremists like Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi, impede even more prosperity in NY-23.

A little more than one year after President Trump took office, the U.S. economy continues to soar to new heights. During the past week, American workers, businesses, and families have read news reports with headlines that show the American economy is back: more jobs, more opportunity, more growth.

A majority of Americans agree with President Trump on immigration. The problem solvers caucus, which I lead, has proposed a practical bi-partisan compromise which could lead to legislation in spite of opposition from radical extremists on the left and right. Problem solvers agree that any bill, which preserves Obama-era protections for illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. as children, should be accompanied by funding for a wall, an end to chain migration, and termination of the diversity visa lottery program.

Last week the American people rejected the government shutdown; they know full well that catering to extremism is no way to run a country. Children’s health care, our military and countless other services Americans depend on cannot be held hostage so extremists can make a point.

Fortunately, America is open for business again in many ways. After I voted to reopen the government Monday evening, I spent the rest of the week traveling the district listening and gathering input from people on how we can improve government.

President Trump’s leadership has put American foreign policy on a bold and promising new course–Put America First— calling for a great reawakening of nations, for the revival of their spirits, their pride, their people, and their patriotism. Officially recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel is an important step to peaceful resolution a lingering regional conflict.

Make sure to follow our social media channels and check our website for more details on the events we attend. As always, please stay in touch and share your thoughts by contacting any of our offices.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on The State of the District: NY-23 | New NY 23rd

How Much Would You Pay To Defeat Rep. Reed? | New NY 23rd

There are inherited problems with Primary Elections. One is that people don’t want to donate to a candidate who might not be the party’s nominee. We won’t know who will be the NY23rd’s Democratic Congressional Candidate until after the June 26 Democratic Primary. That creates a major problem. The Democratic Candidate will need funds. Calling donors takes time and he or she also has to campaign.

Let’s look at some facts:

  • Nate Shinagawa (2012) was able to raise $800,000 in 10 months (with a 3 candidate primary thrown in)
  • Martha Robertson (2014) raised $2.3 million in 18 months
  • John Plumb (2016) brought in $1.6 million in 15 months
  • There are 19 weeks from the Primary to the General Election
  • As of September 30, 2017 Rep. Reed has received  $1,385,746 for the 2018 campaign. Only $107,901 (25.5%) of those funds came from the NY23rd!

The GOOD NEWS is that we can help replace Tom Reed.

Grassroots Volunteers for a Reed-Free 23, a group of concern activitists from the Jamestown area, have set up an Act Blue fund to raise money to be placed in an escrow account. The money in the account will go directly to who wins the June 26 Democratic Primary.

The following letter, from the Grassroots Volunteers for a Reed-Free 23, explains our needs and the process of donating through Act Blue.  (Follow this link for a pdf copy of the letter below Reed-Free 23 letter which can be emailed to friends or placed on social media).

Note, the links in the copy of the letter are not live. You can reach the information about the candidates by clicking here and go to the Act Blue site by clicking here.

.

  • There were 39 donors when article this was posted (8:10 pm Friday, January 19, 2018).
  • There were 87 donors donating $3,740 ($42.99/donor)at 8:10 pm on Monday, January 22, 2018. 
  • There were 109 donors donating $4,543 ($41.68/donor)  at 9:10 pm on Wednesday, January 24, 2018.
  • There were 129 donors donating $5,268 ($40.84/donor) at 6:35 pm on Saturday, January 27, 2018.
  • There were 155 donors donating $6,244 ($40.28/donor) at 2:55 pm on Wednesday   January 31, 2018.
  • There were 165 donors donating $6,605 ($40.03/donor) at 8:01 pm on Friday, February 2, 2018.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on How Much Would You Pay To Defeat Rep. Reed? | New NY 23rd

Government of, by, and for the Government. | New NY 23rd

Erik Prince, the security contractor with close ties to the Trump administration, has in recent years helped recruit former American and British spies for secretive intelligence-gathering operations that included infiltrating Democratic congressional campaigns, labor organizations and other groups considered hostile to the Trump agenda, according to interviews and documents.–New York Times

Mark Mazzette and Adam Goldman, reporting in a front page article in The New York Times for Sunday, March 8, report on infiltration of domestic organizations by operatives with close ties to the Trump Administration.

Erik Prince, the brother of controversial Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, is linked to efforts to infiltrate and damage the National Federation of Teachers, which Secretary DeVos has attacked as having a stranglehold on politicians.

Whether or not the Trump Administration can be directly linked to spies working on its behalf, these activities aren’t fair play. Moles, hidden cameras, stolen documents have no place in our society. Even though Nixon had to resign and courts have ruled against these practices repeatedly, they go on unrestrained. Rather than government of, by, and for the people, this is government of, by and for government.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Government of, by, and for the Government. | New NY 23rd