San Bernardino from a Woman’s Point of View | New NY 23rd

This article was written by Cath Kestler, Activist and resident of Silver Creek for the past 31 years.

Last Wednesday, it was late in the afternoon as I sat at my dining room table putting pen to paper making a “To Do” list as most women do this time of year.  The kitchen was filled with the aroma of one of my family’s favorite meals, our beloved dogs were at my feet (probably thinking that since I’m at the table, maybe a stray scrap of Mom’s lasagna would fall off the table); looking out the window I noticed one of those beautiful WNY sunsets were beginning to develop, across the room I heard that dreaded sound from across the room: Breaking News Report.  Another mass shooting was unfolding before my eyes.  The vibrant hues of the color red proved to be a warning  to me, the airwaves were filled with reports of two to three shooters wearing all black tactical gear, carrying assault weapons at a San Bernardino developmental resource center that cares for  that developmentally disabled individuals.  Fourteen presumed dead and fourteen injured, reporters stated, details were sketchy at the moment.

A tear developed in the corner of my eye, having a daughter that works closely with the developmentally disabled individuals in our town; what stung even more is the fact that we have much loved family members with developmental disabilities.  It was actually at a holiday/training luncheon for the caregivers of the individuals utilizing the center who were the target by one of their own.

Most people who know me, have told me I am brutally honest to a fault, I frequently have been accused as being outspoken and I currently take up the task with some pretty phenomenal women as activists in our area.  We speak out and fight for the issues that affect all of us in Chautauqua County and across the country.  My columns are written from a liberal (not librul) progressive point of view to further the agenda that the majority of Americans feel is at the best interest of the country at large.  Frequently, after reading my column I get a barrage of comments online by obvious bloviating males afraid of a woman’s point of view armed with hard facts.  The words of Richard Nixon come to mind when I read the comments and trying to understand the ‘nattering nabobs of negativism’ that regurgitate the same points over and over again never really talking about the subject at hand.  I guess, some digress…

While this investigation continues into what and why this occurred, the ones suffering are the victims, whether they’re alive, deceased or injured; the sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, sisters, brothers, grandparents real question remains: When is Congress going to do what must be done?  The world is watching, not just our country; and waiting, to see what will be done.

In a rare address from the Oval Office last night, President Obama called on Congress to authorize military operations against the Islamic State and to tighten gun restrictions.  He stated, ‘The threat from terrorism is real, but we will overcome it.  We will destroy ISIL and other organizations that try to harm us.  Our success won’t depend on tough talk, or abandoning our values, or giving into fear.  That’s what groups like ISIL are hoping for.  Instead, we will prevail by being strong and smarnd obviously the individuals impacted.  With time, hearts, thoughts and wounds will heal, but the rt, resilient and relentless and by drawing upon every aspect of American power.

To begin with, Congress should act to make sure no one on the no-fly list should be able to buy a gun.  What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to buy a semi-automatic weapon?  This is a matter of national security.

Here’s what else we cannot do.  We cannot turn against one another by letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam.  That, too, is what ISIL wants.  ISIL does not speak for Islam, they are thugs and killers, part of a cult of death, and they account for a tiny fraction of more than a billion Muslims around the world—including millions of patriotic Muslim Americans who reject their hateful ideology.  Moreover, the vast majority of terrorist victims around the world are Muslims.  If we’re succeeding in defeating terrorism we must enlist Muslim communities as some of the strongest allies rather than push them away through suspicion and hate.

Let’s not forget that freedom is more powerful than fear; that we have always met challenges—whether war or depression, natural disasters or terrorist attacks—by coming together around our common ideals as one nation, as one people.  So long as we stay true to that tradition, I have no doubt America will prevail.’

Before last night poignant speech by President Obama, the cover of the New York Times for the first time since the 1920’s had an editorial that basically boils down to, “Opponents of gun control are saying…that determined killers obtained weapons illegally in places like France, England and Norway that have strict gun laws.  Yes, they did.  But at least those countries are trying.  The United States is not.”

We as a nation voiced our outrage and demanded Congress take action immediately regarding gun reform legislation.  What was Congress’ answer?  To bring a vote up and pass for the 60th time to repeal the ACA and to defund Planned Parenthood.  Our Congressman of the NY 23rd district voted, “Yay” to take away much needed clinics for women’s issues and take away insurance for roughly, over 15 million newly insured Americans; some of which this is their only chance at being able to afford health insurance.

Congress chose to ignore gun reform despite this tragedy and others like it.  It boils down to the fact that the majority of Congress is on the payroll of the powerful NRA lobby to the tune of over $30 million this year alone.  Rep. Tom Reed has gotten his fair share to the amount of $8,950 and I’m betting dollars to doughnuts that another check is on its way due to the fact that Congress refuses to admit we have a gun legislation problem.

When the people were killed in this latest tragedy, my Congressman, Tom Reed said he is praying for the victims.  When Rep. Tom Reed asks you for money this campaign season, and he will, I think we should tell him we’ll pray he gets some.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on San Bernardino from a Woman’s Point of View | New NY 23rd

Twenty-two Republican Governors Oppose Student Loan Relief | New NY 23rd

Everyone knows someone that’s struggling post pandemic. And, you know, if we help folks in the communities so that they – reduce the chances of them going into default, everybody wins. It helps the economy.–Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona

From the governor’s letter:

As governors, we support making higher education more affordable and accessible for students in our states, but we fundamentally oppose your plan to force American taxpayers to pay off the student loan debt of an elite few…

Those eligible for relief are not “an elite few.” The idea that individual American taxpayers will “pay off student loan debt” is false. If the governors have a plan for making higher education affordable, the letter doesn’t mention it.

“College may not be the right decision for every American, but for the students who took out loans, it was their decision: able adults and willing borrowers who knowingly agreed to the terms of the loan and consented to taking on debt in exchange for taking classes,” the letter states. “A high-cost degree is not the key to unlocking the American Dream—hard work and personal responsibility is.”

The governor’s answer may be to skip college, if you can’t afford it.

Ayana Archie writes:

It (the letter) further argues that it is unfair to those who previously already paid off their student loans.

This is a silly argument: Helping those in need isn’t unfair to those lucky enough to not need help.

The governors also expressed concern that the forgiveness plan could encourage higher education institutions to drive up their costs, and therefore worsen inflation.

These Republican governors spread fear of inflation, but give no evidence that loan forgiveness would have any undesirable consequences. Some Republican governors didn’t sign the letter.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Twenty-two Republican Governors Oppose Student Loan Relief | New NY 23rd

Financial Disclosure | New NY 23rd

Linda Andrei

Click to access 10019678.pdf

Max Della Pia

Click to access 10018314.pdf

Ian Golden

Click to access 10018407.pdf

Tracy Mitrano

Click to access 10019727.pdf

Eddward Sundquist

Click to access 10017422.pdf

These reports might have significance for the November election. Tom Reed has attacked previous challengers for their (or their spouse’s) investments.

Tom Reed’s financial disclosure report for 2017 isn’t available yet; it should be available two weeks from now. His 2018 report won’t be available until this time next year.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Financial Disclosure | New NY 23rd

Presidential Privilege and Classification | New NY 23rd

The two sides also clashed substantially over the duties of the special master. Mr. Trump’s lawyers argued that the arbiter should look at all the documents seized in the search and filter out anything potentially subject to attorney-client or executive privilege. By contrast, the government argued that the master should look only at unclassified documents and should not adjudicate whether anything was subject to executive privilege. — Reported in “The New York Times” by Charlie Savage, Alan Feuer, Glenn Thrush and Maggie Haberman Published Sept. 9, 2022 Updated Sept. 10, 2022, 7:36 a.m. ET

Could documents subject to a president’s attorney-client privilege be properly classified? I don’t think so. It is unlikely that anyone would need to discuss state secrets with a lawyer, even if the lawyer had proper clearance. But not all classified documents are properly classified–some might be classified mistakenly or to save government agencies or officials from embarrassment. The former president did use classification to hide his phone conversation with Ukraine’s president, reportedly. Evidently, a president could order documents classified to hide his interaction with a lawyer.

Could documents subject to executive privilege be classified? They could be. A president might order privileged documents classified to protect them from exposure. The Defense Department might classify documents related to discussions with others in the government including the president. That said, it isn’t clear what “residual executive privileges” a former president retains. DOJ reportedly believes there are none.

Are documents marked classified still classified? When officially declassified, copies should be so marked; as long as documents are marked “classified,” they must be treated as if they are classified. A looser policy would lead to chaos.

What became of the notes on the Helsinki meeting? Does President Biden know the secret? Will the public ever know?

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Presidential Privilege and Classification | New NY 23rd

Bad Arguments | New NY 23rd

House Democrats got their historic day. They now own the first impeachment in American history that had no bipartisan support, only bipartisan opposition. They now own the first impeachment that contains no criminal violations, only political disputes.–White House

These arguments are false:

  1. Because some say DJT was impeached for no good reason, impeachment of a future President for no good reason is justified.
  2. Impeachment of DJT betrays those who elected him, even though voters know more about him now than they did then.
  3. The only legitimate remedy for a corrupt President is the next election.
  4. A conspiracy of Republican politicians to defend a Republican President no matter what makes impeachment illegitimately partisan.
  5. If some have long favored impeachment, that makes it illegitimate.
  6. Only crimes justify impeachment.
  7. Giving DJT the option to defend himself presumes his guilt.
  8. Lies only matter if one has sworn to tell the truth.
  9. Laws only need be obeyed after reaffirmation by the courts.
  10. DJT is exonerated if not removed by the Senate.

If we are to be a nation of laws, we must reject these arguments.

This entry was posted in Trump and tagged Impeachment. Bookmark the permalink.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Bad Arguments | New NY 23rd

Claudia Tenney’s slander | New NY 23rd

Seen on Claudia Tenney’s campaign website:

Biden is and has always acted despicably.

Joe Biden was also the worst Vice President and the worst Senator in American history, save maybe Kamala.

Reminiscent of a decrepit old Soviet leader of yore propped up by the diabolical shadow of government behind the scene …

The meanness of Communist authoritarianism was screaming out of a decrepit Biden.

This is how she claims to be “fighting for you in Congress.” Don’t believe it? Look for yourself. Claudia Tenney isn’t fit to be a member of the House.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Claudia Tenney’s slander | New NY 23rd

Did you get your postcard yet? | New NY 23rd

On May 12, Tom Reed wrote on his facebook page:

The postcards to notify constituents of my next town hall meeting are ready to be mailed out. This meeting will take place two weeks from today, on Tuesday, May 26.

Did you get yours yet?

This entry was posted in Congress, Political and tagged postcards, Rep. Tom Reed, townhall. Bookmark the permalink.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Did you get your postcard yet? | New NY 23rd

What do President Biden and Harry Truman have in common? | New NY 23rd

What do President Biden and Harry Truman have in common? Both were Senators, both faced (and in the case of President Biden, still face) bitter partisan opposition, both took office in perilous times. In the March 7th issue of The New Yorker, Beverly Gage writes:

Americans today seem to believe that we live in especially exhausting political times. But the rhythms of our moment—pandemic, protest, pandemic, election, insurrection, pandemic, invasion of Ukraine—have nothing on the Truman era. Between April, 1945, when Franklin D. Roosevelt’s death thrust Harry S. Truman into office, and January, 1953, when Truman handed the Presidency to Dwight D. Eisenhower, the war in Europe ended, Hitler killed himself, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, the Cold War began, the state of Israel came into being, the Soviet Union developed its own nuclear weapons, China underwent a Communist revolution, the West created nato, the world created the United Nations, and the Korean War began.

Gage writes that the postwar period wasn’t a time of bipartisan coöperation and good will. Rather: It was also an era of vicious, operatic partisanship. McCarthy denounced Truman as soft on Communism, Marshall as a tool of Soviet masters. 

Reviewing Jeffrey Frank’s new book, “The Trials of Harry S. Truman: The Extraordinary Presidency of an Ordinary Man, 1945-1953” (Simon & Schuster), Gage writes that the Truman Committee on Civil Rights, created in 1946 following a surge in white-supremacist violence, came out in support of an anti-lynching law, voting rights for Black Americans, and a more robust system of federal enforcement.

However Truman did not win universal health care or nationalize the steel industry or effectively defend the labor movement from corporate backlash. Perhaps the best that can be said is that he tried, often pushing against powerful conservative forces across the aisle and within his own party.  

Finally, Gage writes that Frank argues, the events that were averted deserve to be part of the historical discussion, too. Above all, the world did not descend into a nuclear-armed Third World War, a prospect that loomed over every minute of Truman’s Presidency and pervades every page of Frank’s book. That may have been Truman’s greatest accomplishment.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/03/14/harry-truman-helped-make-our-world-order-for-better-and-for-worse-jeffrey-frank-the-trials-of-harry-s-truman

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on What do President Biden and Harry Truman have in common? | New NY 23rd

Must we live with President Trump for four years? | New NY 23rd

Must we live with President Trump for at least four years? Most likely we must. Brian Dickerson discusses this at length in the Detroit Free Press article cited.

Here are some unlikely possibilities:

  • Impeachment
  • Twenty-fifth Amendment
  • Resignation

Impeachment is unlikely unless a majority of Republicans lost confidence in the President after evidence of very serious wrong-doing emerged. I don’t think that mere collusion with foreign intelligence agents meets that standard. Impeachment is a serious matter which should not be discussed lightly or attempted prematurely. Remember how infuriating talk of impeaching Hillary Clinton was prior to her defeat in the election?

The Twenty-fifth Amendment would apply only if  Trump’s health would fail or his Cabinet and Congress were convinced he was unfit to serve, an unlikely possibility.

Trump might resign if the job became tiresome as indeed it might. He also might resign if the courts ordered him to divest, which he might not be willing to do. Resignation would make VP Pence President; Trump could convincingly claim that he had chosen Pence with that in mind.

Four years is a long time. Anything might happen.

http://www.freep.com/story/opinion/columnists/brian-dickerson/2017/02/17/trump-end-game/97990346/

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/trump-impeachment-democrats-235184

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Must we live with President Trump for four years? | New NY 23rd

Political Glossary | New NY 23rd

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”–Lewis Carroll

  • That’s a conversation we need to have.I don’t want to talk about it.
  • I will take these concerns from constituents back to Washington D.C.constituents’ concerns will be forgotten before Tom leaves the room.
  • Your opinions are important to me.Why should I care what you think?
  • I’ll get back to you on that.—I don’t want to talk about it.
  • We need to agree to disagree.--forget you!
  • national emergencyCongress won’t cooperate.
  • taxpayer moneyany government spending.
  • bipartisan bill-any bill which one approves with at least one sponsor from each party.
  • reintroduce a billit previously died in committee and likely will again.
  • harmful, unnecessary regulationsthey cost you or your business time and money.
  • Breaking newsnews.
  • Fake newsanything found disagreeable.
  • TDSthe idea that Trump’s blather makes responsible people crazy; there may be some truth to that.
  • The leftanything but the far right.
  • The other side-the left.

This entry was posted in Congress, Political, Reed’s Views and tagged spin. Bookmark the permalink.

Posted in Blog | Comments Off on Political Glossary | New NY 23rd