It’s not the language that is evil


It’s not the language that is evil, but the ideas expressed–racial discrimination and notions of a class system based on wealth and ethnic predominance are evil. They would be no less evil if couched in the daintiest words and phrases. Careless and willful ignorance are evil as well.

Evil can’t be explained away and mustn’t be excused.



© William Hungerford – Jan. 2018


About whungerford

* Contributor at where we discuss the politics, economics, and events of the New New York 23rd Congressional District (Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Chemung, (Eastern) Ontario, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben,Tioga, Tompkins, and Yates Counties) Please visit and comment on whatever strikes your fancy.
This entry was posted in Racism. Bookmark the permalink.

52 Responses to It’s not the language that is evil

  1. josephurban says:

    Ryn. If ,as you say, you interpret the Constitution by the meaning of the words in 1789 then you should read Article 3. Which gives the SCOTUS the power to decide cases on appeal. Which is what the SCOTUS does. So, any decision made by the SCOTUS in deciding what the words of the Constitution mean is in line with the orignal intent of Article 3.


  2. whungerford says:

    General welfare is in the Constitution twice–it is no accident. There is no reason to think it meant then other than it means today–anything the legislature deems as for the good of the country.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.