A brief history of Presidential nominating

PrezsThe electoral college, created to give power to slave states, is enshrined in the Constitution. The details of political nominations are not. The nominating process has evolved over the years:

 

 

 

  • King Caucus–Candidates were selected at party caucuses. Delegates were appointed by state legislatures. The people had no role. Around 1835, when Andrew Jackson was President, the legislative caucus was replaced with a national convention.
  • Conventions–Since 1836, every major party has nominated its candidate at a national convention. Conventions eventually required delegates to take a loyalty pledge.
  • Primaries–Primaries gave a role to the voters, but initially primary victories didn’t matter. In 1952 Estes Kefauver won twelve primanries; Adlai Stevenson, the nominee, entered none. Robert Taft won six while Eisenhower won five; Eisenhower was nevertheless the nominee. However, since 1968, the winner of primaries has been the nominee.
  • Super delegates–In 1984, Democrats, recognizing the danger of an unsatisfactory candidate winning primaries, created a system of super-delegates to return some discretion to party officials. Republicans, sadly, have yet to do this. After Trump, they may take this precaution.

Candidates Sanders and Trump claim that the system for Presidential nominations is flawed. Both have a point. No completely satisfactory process has yet evolved.

For an interesting discussion see this article titled “How to steal an election,” by historian Jill Lepore:

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/07/04/conventions-primaries-and-the-presidency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

About whungerford

* Contributor at NewNY23rd.com where we discuss the politics, economics, and events of the New New York 23rd Congressional District (Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Chemung, (Eastern) Ontario, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben,Tioga, Tompkins, and Yates Counties) Please visit and comment on whatever strikes your fancy.
This entry was posted in 2016 and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A brief history of Presidential nominating

  1. pystew says:

    We need to look back into the past to see how far we have come. From the party leaders in the “smoked filled rooms deciding who the candidate would be to an almost real democracy in action. (The Dems have the Super delegates and the GOP leaders control who the delegates will be.) Who knows how the Conventions will evolve?

  2. josephurban says:

    One flaw For the GOP has been the “winner-take-all” primaries. That is why Trump, with only about 40-45% of the GOP vote, has been able to get the nomination. If delegates had been awarded based on the proportion of votes, he would not be the nominee.
    I presume they went to this system to give Jeb the advantage. Figuring he would win the pluralities in most states. And he would win big early, driving others out of the race. But then, the Law of Unintended Consequences kicked in and we have Trump.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s