Preventing IRS Abuse and Protecting Free Speech Act

Doesn't know much about Social Security, may not want to learnTom Reed seldom explains his votes. On Tuesday, June 14, the House considered H.R. 5053, Preventing IRS Abuse and Protecting Free Speech Act. Under current law, the IRS requires certain tax exempt organizations to file a form which details all donors who have contributed over $5,000 in one year. The information is kept on file by the IRS, but not released publicly for certain organizations. H.R. 5053 reverses that policy, prohibiting the IRS from collecting any of this information. This could make it easier for interested parties to direct funds to political campaigns without any disclosure. Some tax exempt organizations, such as 501(c)(4) entities are not prohibited from participating in political activities. This legislation also raises the possibility that foreign interests could finance political efforts covertly since the only real deterrent for that is the oversight from the IRS. If no disclosure is required, there is nothing standing in the way of an increase in secret and potentially illegal political spending. H.R. 5053 passed on a party line vote. Voting with his party, Rep. Reed, as one might expect, voted AYE.

The GOP, irresponsibly, often campaigns against the IRS as if taxes were unnecessary. Tom Reed, with a poor record of paying his taxes on time, joins with his fellows. This isn’t the first time that Reed has voted for bills hindering the IRS from performing its duties.


About whungerford

* Contributor at where we discuss the politics, economics, and events of the New New York 23rd Congressional District (Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Chemung, (Eastern) Ontario, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben,Tioga, Tompkins, and Yates Counties) Please visit and comment on whatever strikes your fancy.
This entry was posted in 2016, Campaign Finances, Congress, Political, Reed's Views and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Preventing IRS Abuse and Protecting Free Speech Act

  1. pystew says:

    I would like to hear Reed explain this Act at a Town Hall Meeting.


  2. Deb Meeker says:

    Why, I can hear Tom Reed right now at a town hall – telling us that he just protected our 1st Amendment right of free speech! After all, Tom is all about protecting the Constitution, isn’t he?
    Seriously, all we need to do is ask the question: “What’s in it for Tom? Reed?” He’ll have to agree to disagree on that one.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.