The House vs. the IRS

The following information was provided by Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MA).

head-in-the-sandCutting the IRS Budget

On Wednesday the House considered H.R. 4885, the IRS Oversight While Eliminating Spending (OWES) Act. Under current law, user fees collected by the IRS are available to help fund agency operations, including taxpayer assistance. These user fees represent more than $400 million annually. H.R. 4885 instead directs that money to the Treasury Department, which represents a cut to the IRS budget of 4%. Since 2010, the IRS has lost about 17% of its funding due to budget cuts. This has forced the agency to eliminate jobs and delay technology upgrades. It has lengthened the amount of time taxpayers must wait for their returns to be processed and questions to be answered. It has also impacted the agency’s oversight ability, limiting its capacity to audit tax returns, an essential task to detect and discourage cheating.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll161.xml

IRS Employee Oversight 

On Wednesday the House also considered H.R. 1206, the No Hires for the Delinquent IRS Act. This legislation prevents the IRS from hiring any new employees until the Treasury Secretary certifies that no current employees have any serious tax issues. H.R. 1206 is an unnecessary exercise because under existing IRS rules any employee with a tax delinquency must be terminated. It’s worth noting that 99% of IRS employees are fulfilling their tax filing responsibilities. This percentage is higher than the general public and even higher than House members.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll160.xml

IRS Workforce Integrity

On Thursday the House considered H.R. 3724, the Ensuring Integrity in the IRS Workforce Act of 2015. Ostensibly, this legislation prevents the IRS from bringing back an employee who has been terminated. In reality, it is nothing more than a symbolic swipe at the IRS. What if someone is fired “for cause” and that reason is later determined to be an error or rendered moot for some reason? This legislation is a fix in search of a problem since no real life examples of these circumstances have ever been identified.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll163.xml

Bonuses

On Thursday the House also considered H.R. 4890, the IRS Bonuses Tied to Measurable Metrics Act. This legislation prohibits bonuses from being issued to any IRS employee until the Treasury Secretary establishes a more effective customer service plan. Over the past six years the IRS’ budget has been cut by almost a billion dollars and 12,000 jobs have been lost. Yet the workload of the IRS has not diminished. The agency cannot be expected to accomplish the same level of work with diminished resources.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2016/roll162.xml

These were all party-line votes; Rep. Reed voted AYE on all four bills.

 

 

Advertisements

About whungerford

* Contributor at NewNY23rd.com where we discuss the politics, economics, and events of the New New York 23rd Congressional District (Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Chemung, (Eastern) Ontario, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben,Tioga, Tompkins, and Yates Counties) Please visit and comment on whatever strikes your fancy.
This entry was posted in Reed's Views, Taxes. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The House vs. the IRS

  1. pystew says:

    It is quite obvious what the Republicans are doing with the IRS. They complain about how inefficient it is, and then quietly reduce funding and add regulations that makes it more difficult to hire and keep staff. The IRS work load stays the same (or increases) with fewer personnel performing the work. They are doing the same things with the military and Social Security. The controlling the purse is a power that needs to be wrestled away for the GOP.

  2. Deb Meeker says:

    Thank you very much for covering these bills. It seems the GOP’s IRS plans differ from Donald Trump’s, but both seem delusional. How does it serve Congress to cripple the IRS?

  3. mjw1970 says:

    They are hurting their constituents. I’ve called at 7 am, which is when they start taking calls, and there is a 30 minute to 1 hour wait. Later in the day it is wise. Thanks, Reed , fire making people spend hours on hold. They are severely understaffed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s