Rep. Capuano on today’s votes on trade

caucus.480Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MA) wrote:

Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)

The trade bills this week were considered under a Rule that prohibited any amendments.  Unlike the Senate, which at least had the opportunity to improve and amend the bill put forward, the House was not allowed to offer a single amendment. Under this Rule, the House considered a motion related to Title II of H.R. 1314 renewing Trade Adjustment Assistance Programs, which are intended to help workers who lose their employment as a result of increased trade. Some sectors of the economy are more significantly impacted than others. These programs have been providing education, training, and other assistance for years. Unfortunately, this legislation just doesn’t go far enough to assist impacted workers. Public sector employees, for example, whose jobs might be outsourced are not eligible to receive any assistance through these programs.  Furthermore, in a cynical political maneuver, this proposal was tied to Fast Track (see below).  If this passed, Fast Track would pass.  In effect defeating TAA was the only way to stop Fast Track. I voted NO. The motion FAILED to pass.  Under the Rule, because the House did not pass the motion, the overall bill, including Fast Track, fails unless the vote on TAA is reversed.

Rep. Reed voted AYE as expected.

Note: Immediately after TAA failed, the Speaker made a motion to reconsider the vote next week.  His hope is to switch enough votes so TAA passes, thus allowing Fast Track to move forward to the President’s desk.

“Fast Track”/Trade Promotion Authority (TPA)

Even though the TAA portion failed, the House still voted on the TPA portion.  As you may know, Congress will soon consider two trade agreements. Historically, Congress has had the authority to agree, reject, or amend any proposed trade agreements submitted for ratification. If amended, the President was then required to re-negotiate the agreements to incorporate the changes made.

The Obama Administration, like past Presidents, requested Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), more commonly known as “Fast Track”.  I do not support TPA because it significantly limits the voice of the legislative branch. By approving TPA, Congress agrees to give up its right to amend the trade agreement and instead simply takes an up or down vote on it. In this case, the House voted to grant TPA before any trade agreement was even finalized. 

I think it is unwise for any Member of Congress to surrender our constitutional responsibilities without knowing exactly why this step is necessary and what specifically Congress is agreeing to. I voted NO. The motion for TPA passed, though the overall bill failed, and the entire vote is recorded below:

Rep. Reed voted AYE as expected.


About whungerford

* Contributor at where we discuss the politics, economics, and events of the New New York 23rd Congressional District (Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Chemung, (Eastern) Ontario, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben,Tioga, Tompkins, and Yates Counties) Please visit and comment on whatever strikes your fancy.
This entry was posted in Congress, Economics, Political, Reed's Views and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Rep. Capuano on today’s votes on trade

  1. catkestler says:

    I have been opposed to the Fast Track and the TAA from the beginning. It made me leery the minute Tom Reed jumped on board so fast.
    Now I have been hearing from a group of Democrat activists stating that only allowing the President work out this trade deal is a good thing because he is “pro middle-class” and wouldn’t allow anything to happen to us.
    I’m under the idea that big corporations hand their hands in the way this trade deal is written up.
    I know we have more calls to make to prevent this from happening.
    I have driven around our area when back in the 80’s we were a booming with manufacturers and now, every where I turn there are abandoned factories and skilled professionals out of work or stuck working at Walmart(the king of imported Chinese made goods).
    I fully back President Barack Obama and admire the obstructionists and bigotry he has put up with. I’m usually the first one shouting his praises at how much he actually has accomplished, but I simply cannot stand behind him on this.


  2. catkestler says:

    Thanks for this article, William. Interesting to have another view besides Reed’s.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.