The DEC needs to Follow It’s Mission Statement

There are many localized dramas playing out in the NY 23rd Congressional District. Although many of us are breathing a bit easier since the Hydro-fracking ban, those around Seneca Lake are still fighting the LPG Storage proposal. The following is a letter to the editor (of a few newspapers) from activist, Peter Gamba comparing the DEC’s perceived actions and their Mission Statement.  Mr. Gamba gave permission for us to publish it.

The DEC needs to follow its Mission.

I went to the DEC issues conference that was addressing the LPG storage in the salt no-lpg-babycaverns off Seneca Lake.  This is an attempt by the DEC to address the community’s environmental concerns that have been in the public media and community for a long time.

To me there are many health, safety and local economic issues. The main health and safety issue is the high risk that Crestwood and the DEC deny exist to the lake water that serves 100,000 people in the Seneca Lake area.

From listening to the discussion on Thursday, it is clear to me that the risk to protecting the water has not been addressed from a systematic environmental and ethical standpoint by either Crestwood or the DEC.

We are in a era where we need to ask the question “If we do this then what?” not just do it.

The livability and safety of the community is what matters. However, from what I have observed, money matters more over safety to the DEC and the Crestwood Industry.  Below is the DEC’s Mission Statement.

 “The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) was created on July 1, 1970 to combine in a single agency all state programs designed to protect and enhance the environment.

Mission: “To conserve, improve and protect New York’s natural resources and environment and to prevent, abate and control water, land and air pollution, in order to enhance the health, safety and welfare of the people of the state and their overall economic and social well-being.”

“DEC’s goal is to achieve this mission through the simultaneous pursuit of environmental quality, public health, economic prosperity and social well-being, including environmental justice and the empowerment of individuals to participate in environmental decisions that affect their lives.”

The DEC needs to address its mission statement in a more comprehensive manner and not address economic prosperity solely from an industry standpoint. The community and the environment matter more and from the mission statement the issues conference needs to focus on the environmental  part of the mission as well as listening to the  community individuals  who have decided to participate.

Peter Gamba   – Committee to Preserve the Finger Lakes

Advertisements

About pystew

Retired Teacher, political science geek, village trustee. I lean a little left, but like a good political discussion. My blog, the New NY 23rd (http://newny23rd) is about discussing the issues facing the people of our new congressional district. Let's hear all sides of the issues, not just what the candidates want us to hear.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The DEC needs to Follow It’s Mission Statement

  1. Deb Meeker says:

    Thank you Peter Gamba for sharing your letter here.
    It should be very obvious to the DEC by now, the majority of Seneca Lake residents, and many others in the whole Finger lakes region expect a more comprehensive study about this issue.
    Do you have any ideas where and why the apparent breakdown in the DEC’s upholding their Mission Statement?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s