Owego townhall meeting Feb. 19, 2015


New NY 23rd reader Patricia Bence provided this report on Tom Reed’s Owego meeting.

With a wind chill approaching 20 degrees below zero around 50 people attended a meeting with Congressman Tom Reed at the Tioga County Office building on Thursday, February 19, 2015. Reed’s agenda was to hold a “discussion” with the public on the subject of his recently proposed legislation, Defense of Property Rights Act (H.R. 510) .

Defense of Property Rights Act.  

As mentioned in an earlier New NY 23rd post, the Defense of Property Rights Act is an attempt to permit property owners to obtain compensation (sue) when local, State, or Federal government impairs the value of ownership. Reed is saying that property owners with mineral rights could sue New York State, since they potentially lost millions of dollars when fracking was banned.

Reed started the meeting stating that the President asked all members of congress to ask their constituents what to do about the Islamic State. We never got to that. He then talked for some time about how this bill came about. He mentioned the idea occurred to him when fracking became controversial. He mentioned several times during the rather raucous meeting that the law would serve any perceived loss related to one’s property, not just fracking.

Many people made statements followed by questions. The crowd was very involved and vocal. I think Reed was surprised and frustrated at several points, in my opinion.

The plan would have property owners evaluate the price of their perceived loss up to a cap of $2o, ooo or 20% of their loss. Several people said 20% of what? How can the landowners put a price on something (gas) that is still below the ground? Others asked how the money would be distributed? Tom said one possibility is that they would get 20% off their tax bill, which someone pointed out would raise taxes for the rest of us in the county. Reed said this bill would apply to any government agency that takes away ones right to make money or enjoyment from their property for any reason, not just fracking.

One speaker said she loved the bill because it would force landowners in Tioga County to realize there isn’t much quality gas here as Jerry Acton has been saying all along.

Frieda Black, a woman who owns a farm (110 acres) in Chemung County explained she turned down a signing bonus of $2,000 an acre because she didn’t want to be responsible for the possibility of polluting hers or other person’s property. She has an organic farm and feared not having clean water. Her most powerful message to Reed was: This bill will prevent any government agency from creating laws that protect society’s health.

A retired Veterinarian spoke to me, after the meeting. He said he went out to a farm, found that a cow had TB, and told the farmer it is state law that he couldn’t keep the cow. Under this law the taxpayers would have to pay for loss of his cow.

Responding to a constituent who said she didn’t believe drilling belonged in our community, Reed said there is no evidence of hydraulic fracking fluid in any water anywhere. Someone shouted out “Have you been to Pennsylvania? “ He said he has been there, and then admitted to the problem of methane migration which has to be looked at.

Another woman questioned Reed’s interpretation of the 5th Amendment. There is no “taking” i.e. the state did not take anything from the landowners. Reed disagreed with this, and said he believes the ban took away the landowners right to use their property as they saw fit. Many people said it’s the gas companies that should pay.

When asked where the money was to come from Reed’s aide said the state. Later, Reed explained it could be any government agency that violated a person’s property rights. Several people throughout the meeting pointed out that the taxpayers will be paying and indeed raising taxes in the governmental entity that committed the so-called crime.

Another person said I would like to see the reaction you would get in Westchester County when their taxes go up because of these payments to land owners. Reed did not seem fazed by this saying well yes it would be all of NYS taxpayers collectively paying for what their Governor did.

A question about how this law would affect zoning prompted Reed to give the same response he gave all evening “If the landowner can prove his right to do what he wants with his property then he has a claim.” The crowd groaned.

There were several conversations about the repercussions of such a bill in that everyone would be suing Town Boards, State Government, EPA etc. for every perceived loss of an opportunity to use their property as they wished. Someone shouted out “a lawyers bonanza.” And this was going to “open a can of worms”

When asked how successful passing this law may be, he said he was optimistic, and “we are just getting started.” (quiet giggling)

One farmer said he was for “safe drilling,” and another shouted out: “don’t listen to people (in the back) row; they are anti-frackers.” The person next to him said: they make up lies.

There were several long, contentious sessions of back and forth on the ins and outs of the proposed bill ending with Tom sweating a bit.

Affordable Care Act

Reed said he doesn’t believe in a public option for universal health care after another speaker asked what he thought about a public option. He believes in empowering patients and doctors to figure it out in the free market.

A speaker asked “Why won’t you and the Republican party draft a bill on health care that includes the items you like from the ACA and then propose to repeal the rest of it? Because you have been at it for 5 years and saying Repeal and Replace.

Reed admitted they have no replacement plan at the federal level and their proposal would be it belongs to the states to do their own plans. It seems to this writer this is the first acknowledgment by a congressman that Republicans don’t have a plan and have no intention of developing one.

A woman from Ithaca said he should be mindful about reducing Social Security Disability especially when it comes to mental health. Reed responded with “What is considered a disability?”

Reed did allow people to ask questions and made every attempt to provide an answer. This was, however, not a particularly polite audience. He make a remark at the end about following the rules.

Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP)

Two people were outside the meeting room handing out pamphlets asking people to vote no on Trade promotion Authority (fast track) and TPP although they did not address the issue during the meeting.

A Question that didn’t get asked:

“And if this gas takings claim is a winnable case, then NYS will go broke paying forest owners like me who can’t sell timber due to the ash borer quarantine. Is that Reed’s plan? Or do just his friends get to sue?”

Another voice adds:

I believe that the bill (Defense of Property Rights Act) would be a good idea since it will force the landowners to finally evaluate the Marcellus Shale gas drilling performance on their property. Evaluation of thousands of gas wells in north eastern Pennsylvania using the data provided by the gas companies indicates that the Marcellus Shale drilling performance is not economically viable. The performance of gas extraction in the Southern Tier does not match that of Bradford, Susquehanna, and Wyoming Counties in Pa. The gas companies know this since they have drilled test wells. Cuomo knows this, but apparently the landowners do not know this. I asked Tom Reed if he was aware of the analysis of performance of the Marcellus Shale in Pa. and applied to NYS done by Jerry Acton and the non-partisan League of Women Voters, and he indicated that he was. So, Tom Reed is aware that there is no economic boom to drilling in the Marcellus Shale in his district.

If fracking is allowed in NYS, I would be able to use this law to sue for the loss of my property value due to the thousands of trucks driving by creating noise and pollution. Others would be able to sue for their property losses if fracking decreases their property value.

I was happy to see so many Dems there! We outnumbered the pro Tom Reed folks.

About whungerford

* Contributor at NewNY23rd.com where we discuss the politics, economics, and events of the New New York 23rd Congressional District (Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Chemung, (Eastern) Ontario, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben,Tioga, Tompkins, and Yates Counties) Please visit and comment on whatever strikes your fancy.
This entry was posted in Congress, Constituents, Economics, Environmental, fracking, Political, Reed's Views, War and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Owego townhall meeting Feb. 19, 2015

  1. Deb Meeker says:

    Many thanks, Patricia Bence.
    What I gleaned out of this in part is – people are starting to wake up to Tom Reed’s baloney:
    …..expecting all taxpayers in NYS to pay for unusable gas leases for a few
    …..he’ll “look into” methane, or any other question he doesn’t want to answer.
    …..”empowering doctors and patients” – (what does that even mean anyway?) with no replacement plan for the insurance he would end – for over eleven million people
    …..Reed is absolutely not used to having honest answers prepared. Honest answers would sink him.
    Finally, I’m very pleased to hear more constituents are letting Tom Reed know they’ve had enough of his lies.


  2. whungerford says:

    Tom says he wants to know what his constituents think, but is defensive when their views differ from his own.


  3. Anne says:

    Defensive and sweaty, apparently. Which is a tell that he is neither intellectually equipped for nor temperamentally predisposed toward honest debate.


  4. The Conservatives and Libertarians are counting on SCOTUS ruling that will gut the Affordable Care Act and plan to do “nothing” as they want it to return to the status quo it was before it was enacted. They do not want to be promoting the subsidizing of public healthcare. They only want to be promoting the subsidizing of foreign aid and defense; the United States’ largest government-funded Socialist Program.


  5. Anne says:

    Many thanks to Ms. Bence for taking the time both to attend the meeting and to so thoroughly report it. I’m glad to see that sense appeared to be the mood amongst the audience, and it sounds as though everyone came prepared with thoughtful and salient points.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Anne says:

    I remember a recap of some other town hall of his in which a farm owner from Troy, PA came forward and asked about the fact that their family farm, land and water, had been ruined by the activity of the frackers. Reed vowed to both visit the farm and “look into” what had happened to it, but that was the last we ever heard of that.


  7. whungerford says:

    Really? If the Supreme Court would leave millions holding the bag, there would be many angry people. How could anyone expect to profit from that?


  8. pystew says:

    That was the Hector Town Hall Meeting, October, 2014, and you are correct. He said he would visit the farm.


  9. whungerford says:

    Yes, thank you very much Patricia Bence. We hope to hear more from you.


  10. whungerford says:

    When thinking about suing under Reed’s law, remember that only the wealthy with large claims would be able to afford that.


  11. Anne says:

    If someone is going to the PY meeting tonight and it comes up, they could direct him to this study (I posted it to his facebook page but we know how much attention he pays to that): http://cleantechnica.com/2013/10/07/pennsylvania-streams-contaminated-radioactive-water-fracking-research-finds/


  12. Anne says:

    No doubt R & R Recovery will be branching out.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. josephurban says:

    Reed’s bill sounds like a winner to me. I am offering my land for the next Buffalo Bills Stadium. When they don’t build it down here in Naples I will go the NY state and demand taxpayer reimbursement in millions in lost revenue. Thanks, suckers !


  14. whungerford says:

    Tom Reed said: “we are just getting started.” I guess he will be milking this for a long time to come.


  15. Kathy Green says:

    Thanks Patricia, good reporting and much appreciated!


  16. You are welcome. We are following him. His aides are in the county office building twice a week. People take turns visiting.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Pingback: Rep. Reed’s Secretive Town Hall Meetings | New NY 23rd

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.