Texas voter ID decision

4.18 cover no mast.inddJustice Ginsburg’s dissent:

Those requirements, Justice Ginsburg wrote, “may prevent more than 600,000 registered Texas voters (about 4.5 percent of all registered voters) from voting in person for lack of compliant identification.”

“A sharply disproportionate percentage of those voters are African-American or Hispanic,” she added, adding that “racial discrimination in elections in Texas is no mere historical artifact.”

Texas officials quarreled with Justice Ginsburg’s math, which was drawn from evidence presented to a trial court. In their brief urging the justices to allow the election to proceed under the 2011 law, they said that trying to determine the number of people the law would deter from voting was a fool’s errand and called the estimate of 600,000 disenfranchised voters preposterous.

Justice Ginsburg also said the law “replaced the previously existing voter identification requirements with the strictest regime in the country.”

She noted that Texas would not accept several forms of ID that Wisconsin did, including “a photo ID from an in-state four-year college and one from a federally recognized Indian tribe.” The Supreme Court on Oct. 9 refused to let Wisconsin use its voter ID law in the current election.

Texans who lack a required form of identification cannot easily obtain it, Justice Ginsburg wrote. “More than 400,000 eligible voters face round-trip travel times of three hours or more to the nearest” government office issuing IDs, she wrote, and they must generally present a certified birth certificate.

Is anyone fooled by blatant efforts to prevent a democratic vote?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/19/us/supreme-court-upholds-texas-voter-id-law.html

Advertisements

About whungerford

* Contributor at NewNY23rd.com where we discuss the politics, economics, and events of the New New York 23rd Congressional District (Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Chemung, (Eastern) Ontario, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben,Tioga, Tompkins, and Yates Counties) Please visit and comment on whatever strikes your fancy.
This entry was posted in Political, Supreme Court and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Texas voter ID decision

  1. Anne says:

    I figured something like this was in the wings after Roberts’ vote the other day striking down those abortion restrictions in Texas. He does at times approach a\ wild card status, but every time he votes with the so-called ‘liberal’ justices on an issue, he is sure to immediately follow with a sharply–and stupidly–conservative vote in the next.

  2. solodm says:

    The third “branch” has become a strangling vine.

  3. josephurban says:

    When the SCOTUS recently ended compliance with the Voting Rights Act they said it was because racial discrimination in voting was a thing “of the past”. Almost immediately many GOP lead states passed voter suppression laws. Coincidence?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s