The War Hawks are back

war hawks

I’m suggesting (we) change our posture … from a military superpower to a humanitarian superpower.–Howard Zinn

Sebastian Payne and Robert Costa, writing for the Washington Post, give many examples of hawkish statements by Republicans. Here is a sample from the article cited below:

A thirst among many conservative activists for a more muscular U.S. foreign policy was clear over the weekend at a meeting of Americans for Prosperity, the tea-party-affiliated group backed by the billionaire Koch brothers. The loudest applause came when Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), a potential presidential candidate, called for bombing the Islamic State “back to the Stone Age.” 

“If I were president, I would call a joint session of Congress. I would lay out the reasoning of why ISIS is a threat to our national security and seek congressional authorization to destroy ISIS militarily,” (Senator Rand) Paul said in a statement released by his office.

Grass-roots favorite Ben Carson, a doctor-turned-political activist, drew cheers when he declared, “when we get through with ISIS, it should be IS-was.”

The opening for a hawk in the GOP field has even enticed former U.N. ambassador John Bolton, who advocated for a muscular foreign policy during the George W. Bush administration, to consider a White House bid.

According to a Pew Research Center poll  released last week, 46 percent of Republicans said the United States does “too little” to help solve global problems — a 28-point increase from the previous poll, last November. The percentage of Republicans who believe the U.S. does “too much” abroad has dropped from 52 percent to 37 percent.

These people, perhaps even Rand Paul, seem to have forgotten how poorly a foreign policy based primarily on militarism has worked for us in the recent past. Fortunately, President Obama favors a broader, more cautious policy which does not rely primarily on military force.  This deserves public support.

NY-23 Representative Tom Reed, together with other Republicans, took a strong anti-war stand over the chemical weapons in Syria. He has had nothing of substance to say yet about the current crisis. It will be interesting to see which way he turns.

© William Hungerford – September 2014


About whungerford

* Contributor at where we discuss the politics, economics, and events of the New New York 23rd Congressional District (Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Chemung, (Eastern) Ontario, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben,Tioga, Tompkins, and Yates Counties) Please visit and comment on whatever strikes your fancy.
This entry was posted in Congress, Political, President, Reed's Views, War and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The War Hawks are back

  1. Deb Meeker says:

    It’s difficult to remember the last time Republican policies were a good idea ( Eisenhower perhaps?).
    Sadly, Tom Reed has shown his eagerness to follow whatever unthought out crisis his leadership ( Boehner, Heritage Foundation, Tea Party or greedy Energy lobbyists) ask of him.
    Rather than measure twice – or thrice, then cut once, the GOP and Tom Reed seem to go for the random buzz saw effect, leaving behind trunks without limbs, and countries with scorched earth.

    Ex VP Cheney will be speaking to the Republican House members today on how to stay in office and make war.
    Those that listen, are bound to be encouraged to continue the Cowboy Way.


  2. Barbara Griffin says:

    You can bet Tom Reed jumps on the charging horse.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s