Jill Lepore on Corruption

jill lepore

Jill Lepore

The New York story is important because, historically, New York is corruption’s proving ground. In December, 2013, three months before Cuomo shut down the Moreland Commission, it issued a preliminary, ninety-eight-page report describing “an epidemic of public corruption.” For instance: “One out of every eleven legislators to leave office since 1999 has done so under the cloud of ethical or criminal violations.” But those are only the people who got caught violating the scant, weak, and poorly enforced anticorruption laws that govern their conduct. “The real scandal,” according to the report, “is what remains legal.”–Jill Lepore

Historian Jill Lepore has written a far-ranging article on political corruption and campaign finance which appeared in the August 25, 2014 issue of The New Yorker. Titled “The Crooked and the Dead, it is subtitled “Does the Constitution protect corruption?”


Andrew Cuomo

Lepore examines many aspects of her subject. Here are a few of Lepore’s focus points:

  • Corruption in NYS politics
  • Moreland Commission
  • Andrew Cuomo
  • Malcolm Smith
  • Zephyr Teachout
  • Supreme Court
  • Citizens United

Lepore writes:

What remains legal includes the following: between 2009 and 2012, donors gave two hundred and thirty-two million dollars to legislators in Albany, and lobbyists gave six hundred and ninety-three million—a total of nearly one billion dollars in direct political spending. Eighty per cent of individual contributions came from big donors. (New York has hardly any small donors. Of New Yorkers who voted in the last gubernatorial election, fewer than one per cent made campaign donations.) Big donors give big money to both Democrats and Republicans; they give it to whoever holds power. In 2012, when Republicans held a majority in the Senate, they took in thirteen million dollars, while Senate Democrats took in only seven million dollars. In 2010, when Democrats held the Senate majority, the pattern was reversed. Big donors aren’t advancing an ideology or a party, the commission concluded: they’re paying for access. They give money to politicians who wield power over decisions affecting their specific economic interests, regardless of those politicians’ party affiliations or ideological positions.

I can’t do justice here to Jill Lepore’s article which is available on-line. I recommend it highly.

Lepore ends with this:


Zephyr Teachout

Zephyr Teachout would like to debate Andrew Cuomo. She thinks that there ought to be three debates: one on education, one on immigration, and one on fracking. “But,” she admits, “all three would end up in a debate about corruption.” No debates are scheduled. 

© William Hungerford – August 2014


About whungerford

* Contributor at NewNY23rd.com where we discuss the politics, economics, and events of the New New York 23rd Congressional District (Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Chemung, (Eastern) Ontario, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben,Tioga, Tompkins, and Yates Counties) Please visit and comment on whatever strikes your fancy.
This entry was posted in 2014, Campaign Finance, Congress, Political, Supreme Court and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Jill Lepore on Corruption

  1. josephurban says:

    Neither major political party wants to touch the issue of corruption. i wonder why?


  2. whungerford says:

    As Jill Lepore noted: Big donors give big money to both Democrats and Republicans; they give it to whoever holds power.


  3. Pingback: Big Money Backs Reed; People Back Robertson | New NY 23rd

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s