Astorino & Reed: Politicians or Statesmen on Fracking Issues?

no-lpg-babyThe  following article was written by Bette Ek, a member of Citizen Action of the Southern Tier. You might read it in a district newspaper since  the author has sent some a copy. It is printed here with permission of the author.


Back in 1870 a prominent theologian and author named James Freeman Clarke said “A politician thinks of the next election; a statesman thinks of the next generation.”

One of the frustrating aspects of election years, besides  some candidates’ vicious and bizarre campaign ads, is that we too often get unclear or conflicting messages regarding where candidates stand on critical issues.  Many of these issues will have far-reaching impacts, not only on us but on future generations.

For example, I don’t find reassuring gubernatorial candidate Rob Astorino’s position on fracking.  He has proclaimed his fervent support for the Southern Tier as a target for fracking, saying that Binghamton could be the next Dallas. (Ironically, Dallas has recently put in place what industry has called “a de-facto ban on fracking”.) Yet in December 2012 Astorino  signed a resolution barring the acceptance of fracking waste in Westchester County. It’s unclear where he thinks drilling waste from the Southern Tier would go, but it wouldn’t be to his own county. Twelve counties in New York and several states have enacted or are in the process of enacting bans on drilling wastes. Hopefully our leaders in Chemung County, which, shamefully, is already ranked near the bottom of the state in terms of over-all health, will agree with the multitude  of citizens who believe that  to further expose county residents to the  documented health risks inherent in accepting PA’s drilling wastes would be irresponsible.

I also find contradictory  Congressman Reed’s views on fracking and LPG storage in Seneca Lake.  He has stated that he favors fracking but supports exempting the Finger Lakes because of the potential harm increased traffic could cause to the wine and tourism industries. According to the industry’s own predictions LPG storage in Seneca Lake would mean having a truck and rail depot capable of loading and unloading 4 or 5 semi trucks per hour and 24 rail cars in 12 hours.  Sounds like potential harm from increased traffic to me, along with other dangers, given that these trucks and train cars would contain propane and butane.  I’m concerned that Mr. Reed hasn’t supported those fighting this insane proposal despite repeated requests that he do so.

It’s also maddening when candidates from our Governor on down strenuously avoid discussing issues they view as politically dangerous. When forced to publicly comment on fracking, they typically resort to the lame position that they “trust the DEC to protect us.” They apparently have not read the DEC’s proposed fracking regulations and noticed glaring omissions, transparent loop-holes, and the absence of the required scientific support for each proposed regulation. It’s  especially contradictory when they decry  “big government” yet don’t object to the compulsory integration and eminent domain practices inherent in fracking.  These practices support an unholy big government/big industry alliance at its worst.

Yes, I worry a lot about the next generation and who will help us protect it. I’m sure there are genuine statesmen and stateswomen out there; please make it clear who you are so we can vote for you.



About pystew

Retired Teacher, political science geek, village trustee. I lean a little left, but like a good political discussion. My blog, the New NY 23rd (http://newny23rd) is about discussing the issues facing the people of our new congressional district. Let's hear all sides of the issues, not just what the candidates want us to hear.
This entry was posted in 2014 and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Astorino & Reed: Politicians or Statesmen on Fracking Issues?

  1. whungerford says:

    At a townhall meeting in Big Flats, Ms. Ek addressed Tom Reed on the question of fracking. A member of the audience (a Reed confederate?) suggested she not be allowed to speak. When others objected, Tom said he would hear her out even though he knew her views and had rejected them in advance.


  2. pystew says:

    I assume that Rep. Reed never answered her question about how he could justify exempting the Finger Lakes from Fracking because of the impact on the wine/tourist industry, but has no problem with the storage of LPG with the negative impact of truck traffic. He recently repeated those beliefs in the Finger Lakes Times interview and kicked the LPG can down to the state. He is pretty good at taking credit for what the State does (he “urged” Governor Cuomo to provide state money to help the Penn Yan area flood victims). He promotes the repeal of state passed legislation that will bring voters into his camp (Safe Act) but his hands are tied when it comes to LPG storage.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s