Koch Bros, Halliburton, Chesapeake & Rep. Tom Reed

It is well known that Rep. Tom Reed  promotes Natural Gas and hydrofracking. He is the co-chair of the Congressional Natural Gas Caucus and has publicly declared that gas drilling is safe. Reed supports hydrofracking and exporting American-produced natural gas.  (That way we take the risks, and the Gas/Oil Industries reap the profits).

He also get well compensated for his efforts.

On May 4, 2011,  four months into his first term in congress,  Rep. Reed “spoke on the floor of the U.S. House of Representative in support of the responsible and transparent development of America’s abundant natural gas supplies.” He was praised by the American Gas Association (AGA) for “leading the House’s Marcellus Shale Coalition and continuing to help lead America toward a clean energy future.”

In August, 2011 (right after his famous trip the Holy Land) Reed held  a Town Hall Meeting in Burdett (Schulyer County). The Corning Leader reported, “A contentious gas-drilling debate highlighted U.S. Rep. Tom Reed’s town hall meeting in Burdett, where nearly everyone in attendance was anti-drilling. Reed made no bones about his view on the subject – he’s in favor of fracking the Marcellus Shale if it can be done cleanly and responsibly, which he believes it can. ‘I am a supporter of the industry, natural gas,’ Reed said.”

His constituents explained their concerns: “The gas companies win, the people who have a bunch of gas under their land win, the rest of us lose,” one man exclaimed. One woman pointed out: “They (the gas companies) are not from here. We’re from here.” There were questions about federal oversight,  taxing the gas companies, and the affects on tourism. All wise topics to bring up to someone who is suppose to be representing them. Reed likes to say that his purpose of Town Hall Meetings is to hear from his constituents. At Burdett, he told his constituents what he thought. He listened to them, but he didn’t hear their concerns.

Although his constituents at the August 27 Town Hall Meeting left the meeting upset and not impressed with their new representative,  Gas/Oil PACs  were paying close attention. They must have been very impressed with Reed and his willingness to disregard his constituents and support the PACs lucrative high-impact industrial projects. It should be noted:

  •  A week and a half after the Burdett meeting, the Natural Fuel Gas Political Action Committee sent Rep. Reed $2000.
  • Two week s after the meeting America’s Natural Gas Association Political Action Committee sent Rep. Reed $1000.
  • October 1st, America’s Natural Gas Alliance (ANGA) Political Action sent Rep. Reed $2,400.
  • November 15, the Interstate Natural Gas Association PAC sent Rep. Reed $1000.
  • That’s $6,400 in a matter of weeks.

The idea of promoting Natural Gas and Fracking didn’t come out of the blue. Reed received the following donations in the 2009-2010 campaign season. (Remember, his first election was November, 2010).

  • Chesapeake Energy ($5,000)
  • Exxon/Mobil ($5,000)
  • Independent Petroleum Association of America ($5,000)
  • Koch Industry ($5,000)
  • Marathon Oil ($1,000)
  • Natural Fuel Gas Corp ($2,000),
  • Otis Eastern ($17,848)
  • Pioneer Natural Resources (USA) ($750)

Rep. Reed received $110,521 from the Gas/Oil Industry in 2011-2012. $80,400 from PACS, $21,450 from individuals employed in the Gas/Oil Industries. For this campaign,  as of March 10, 2014, he has received $72,950, $51,500 from Gas/Oil PACs, $21,450 from Individuals employed in the Gas/Oil Industry. Those figures will change throughout the campaign. The data will be updated as it becomes available.

The following link: Gas & Oil Corp. Contributions, names 30 different the Gas/Oil  PACs that contributed to Rep. Campaigns (2012 and 2014) and how much each donated. The information was on the Open Secrets website.

I am not naive. Every congress-person gets contributions from special interest groups. The Gas/Oil Industry needed to be researched because it is so controversial. Not only many of the companies that donate to Rep. Reed pay little (or no) federal tax. Rep. Reed is promoting exporting gas/oil–because it is more profitable. Foreign countries get energy, the PACs get the profits,  and we take the risks of spills, explosions , and earthquakes. Reed tries to comfort us by saying that “fracking is safe”. His district directer reminds us that Reed has a law degree; he is not a scientist.

Gas/Oil PACs aren’t Reed’s highest source of PAC donations. In 2012 it was fourth, behind Real Estate PACs, Securities & Investment PACs, and Insurance PACs. That year he received $1,129,847 from 835 different PACs.

By the way, Reed’s salary, paid by taxpayers, is $174,000 a year.  He doesn’t need our money; he needs our votes.

Rep. Tom Reed needs to be held accountable. Does he really represents us?

 

Advertisements

About pystew

Retired Teacher, political science geek, village trustee. I lean a little left, but like a good political discussion. My blog, the New NY 23rd (http://newny23rd) is about discussing the issues facing the people of our new congressional district. Let's hear all sides of the issues, not just what the candidates want us to hear.
This entry was posted in 2014, Constituents, Economics and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Koch Bros, Halliburton, Chesapeake & Rep. Tom Reed

  1. Anne says:

    I questioned him on his facebook page about his commitment to keeping our natural gas resources here, where we can use them. Of course my question was met with a stunning silence. Reed also owns mineral rights to land over in Tuscarora–that information is on his mandatory financial records submissions every year.

    • pystew says:

      Thanks for that information. The more we dig (or should I say DRILL?), the more we dirt we find. If that was something he was proud of, he would be promoting it–“I believe it is so safe I let them drill on my property.”

    • whungerford says:

      There are costs associated with a temporary drilling boom. In Chemung County, drilling in PA has already pushed apartment rents up. Even though the boom is declining now, rents haven’t declined and are unaffordable for many.

  2. whungerford says:

    Does Tom Reed represent us? The answer may depend on who we count as us. If us is all his constituents, the answer is clearly no. If us is only those who have been led to believe that widespread poverty, hardship, underemployment, and unemployment aren’t his responsibility, then perhaps he does. Tom ought to take responsibility for serving all his constituents–those who may agree with him, those who oppose his views, and those who may lack the time and energy to vote.

  3. BOB McGILL says:

    You guys are fracking WACKED ! 30 states allow fracking with very few problems, mostly surface spills and minor accidents. You are beating this to death and it is going to backfire on you. There are a lot of people losing out, on a lot of money, over a bunch of lies just so you can try to get a democrat elected. Those gas companies pay billions to local governments and you could use that money to do a lot of good for the PEOPLE of this state, but you throw it all away just because you are a DEMOCRAT !!!!!! You had better hope that your lies and deception hole out till after the election. 🙂

  4. Pingback: What Cantor-Brat tells us about the Reed-Robertson race | New NY 23rd

  5. Pingback: Koch Brothers in Film and Books | New NY 23rd

  6. Pingback: Citizen Action of New York – Koch Brothers in Film and Books

  7. This is a perfect example of pay-to-play corruption that fellow Republican Walter Jones recognized.

    http://www.amendmentgazette.com/2014/06/05/principled-conservative-congress/

    Corruption greases the wheels of the corporate-state.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s