Rep. Raúl Rafael Labrador (R-ID)

Rep. Raúl Rafael Labrador (R-ID) represents Idaho’s 1st congressional district. A libertarian and tea party favorite, he is frequently promoted as the next Speaker of the House.  He appeared on “Meet the Press” this month and answered some questions:

Congressman, you didn’t vote to raise the debt ceiling. What did you want in return for supporting the hike?

I would have supported any plan that would put us on a path to balance the budget in 10 years. For example, Speaker Boehner’s original “dollar-for-dollar” plan would have been an acceptable approach. I was one of the original cosponsors of and supporters of “Cut, Cap, and Balance” in 2011, which was a terrific plan. It’s disappointing that President Obama – who ran for office in 2008 saying he was going to be a fiscally responsible President – has caused the largest deficits and the largest debt in American history. The debate over the debt ceiling should have forced Congress and the President to work together to reduce the debt. But the President and Harry Reid refuse to negotiate.

There is a feeling that Speaker Boehner is more powerful now because he led the charge, reluctantly, on shutting the government down. Now he’s more forceful in telling conservatives like you what the party should and should not do. How do you see it?

That seems to be the conventional wisdom, but I do not agree with your assessment. The fact that Congress just passed a “clean” debt ceiling is neither a victory for Boehner nor the Republican party; it’s actually a symptom of Congress’ refusal to make tough decisions. There was no sense in fighting on the debt ceiling when a number of Republicans were unwilling to stand together and fight. So, some of us believed it was better to move past this fight and regroup. Conservatives and many moderates feel that we need a bolder agenda. We can’t just be against President Obama’s agenda; we must stand for something. In addition, the number of vocal conservatives is actually growing in the House. To paraphrase Mark Twain,“Reports of the death of House conservatives have been greatly exaggerated.”

Is immigration reform dead for this year?

Yes. The President and Democratic leaders interfered with a good faith bipartisan effort to reach an agreement in the House on immigration reform. Democratic leadership did not want a conservative immigration bill to come out of the House because they wanted the Senate immigration bill to be the only vehicle for immigration reform. In addition, the President continues to assert, whether through words or actions, that he does not need Congress to act. Because of this, the vast majority of House Republicans do not trust that the President will enforce the parts of any immigration reform that he does not like, as he has already done with his own signature health care legislation. The President can buy a lot of goodwill this year by working with Congress to enforce the laws already in the books and – if he does that – we can tackle immigration reform in early 2015 when we’ll be in a better position to negotiate and get real results for the American people.

What would lead you to support a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants now in the country?

I already support a pathway to citizenship; it is the current pathway that exists for anyone who wants to immigrate to our great nation. But I reject creating a special pathway for those who have broken our laws. We have a broken immigration system that must be fixed. Once we solve the main problems with our broken system – border security, interior enforcement and a modern guest worker program – we can deal with the 11 million people who currently reside in our country illegally by granting them a non-immigrant legal status. With that status, they can use the existing pathway to citizenship. They will not cut ahead of the line of the millions of people who have availed themselves of the legal immigration system. But neither will they be denied the opportunity to make themselves right with the law and use the existing pathway. 

Can you name an issue where you could support the President?

I agree with President Obama and Attorney General Holder that we need to reform our criminal sentencing laws. I’ve introduced a bipartisan bill called the Smarter Sentencing Act, which would allow courts to make individualized assessments in nonviolent drug cases, ensuring that limited resources are focused on the most serious offenders, while maintaining public safety. Attorney General Holder has praised the bill several times, and I’m encouraged by the support we’ve gotten across the ideological spectrum from conservative groups like Heritage Action and the Constitution Project to progressive groups like the ACLU and the NAACP.

When you see weather like we’ve been having, do you worry more about climate change?

It’s interesting that about a decade ago there was a lot of talk about “global warming.” Thirty years ago we were talking about “global cooling.” Now all we hear about is “climate change.” There has been evidence throughout history of cycles when the earth gets warmer and cycles when the earth gets colder. We should always be wise stewards of the earth and all of our natural resources. But as a policymaker, I won’t be guided by the global warming propaganda machine. Al Gore – we need you to return your Nobel Peace Prize!

Would Rep. Raúl Rafael Labrador make a good speaker? Could he work with Republican moderates? Could he work with Democrats? Would his far-right views on budget, immigration reform, and climate change result in more wasted years of partisan deadlock?

Certainly any speaker representing a Republican majority must be an orthodox Republican. Still I would hope for one with more reasonable and responsible views.

© William Hungerford – February 2014

About whungerford

* Contributor at where we discuss the politics, economics, and events of the New New York 23rd Congressional District (Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Chemung, (Eastern) Ontario, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben,Tioga, Tompkins, and Yates Counties) Please visit and comment on whatever strikes your fancy.
This entry was posted in Congress, Economics, Environmental, Health Care, Political. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Rep. Raúl Rafael Labrador (R-ID)

  1. Deb Meeker says:

    The fact that Rep. Labrador is open about his views, doesn’t leave me with a better feeling about those views. Tea Party, or Libertarian views in general leave me with the feeling, they would take our country backwards. By backwards, I mean the 14th century. A little Genghis Kahn(ish) for my ideology.


  2. whungerford says:

    I’m struck by the certainty in his views: a balanced budget as a moral absolute, global warming only propaganda.


  3. BOB McGILL says:

    Biography of Genghis Khan, leader of Mongolia and one of history’s great rulers, who conquered most of Eurasia in the early thirteenth century
    Only a hundred years off, but closer than anything else you’ve had to say. 🙂


  4. Barbara Griffin says:

    This guy sounds worse than Boehner. I do wish the Tea Party would just go away and allow this country to move forward.


  5. Deb Meeker says:

    Who can tell what John Boehner will do? He supported the Libertarian shutdown of government, all the Ryan plan cuts and sequester, and facilitated Tea Party actions and legislation. Then on realizing the failures and overall contempt these brought from the public, he “chastised” the extremists, and says “No more”.
    Boehner’s, just like the rank and file Republican’s main goal, it seems, is to just keep their jobs, and hang the consequences.


  6. whungerford says:

    I believe John Boehner’s main goal was to avoid a split in the Republican Party. That’s the point of the Hastert Rule–to vote only on bills that a majority of Republicans support. Any Speaker of a Republican House will act for the Republican Party first; Boehner may be as good a choice as any. I don’t believe a speaker that represents a minority faction would be a better choice.


  7. BOB MCGILL says:‎Cached
    Similar31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs. For information about this project, click on the appropriate box below.


  8. whungerford says:

    The petition project ain’t legit, Bob.


  9. BOB MCGILL says:…/climate-study-evidence-leans-against-human-c…‎CachedSep 18, 2013 – CLIMATE STUDY: EVIDENCE LEANS AGAINST HUMAN-CAUSED GLOBAL WARMING — Group of 50 international scientists releases …


  10. BOB MCGILL says:

    says you, but there are more scientists that are now saying it’s a HOAX


  11. BOB MCGILL says:…/sorry-global-warming-alarmists-the-earth-is-c…‎Cached
    SimilarForbesLoading…May 31, 2012 – Climate change itself is already in the process of definitively rebutting … their theory that humans are causing catastrophic global warming in public debate. … science to scare the public into accepting costly anti-industrial …


  12. BOB MCGILL says:…/a-really-inconvenient-truth-global-warming-is-n…‎Cached
    SimilarFeb 2, 2012 – The days of believing in global warming need to end. … expressing their belief that the theory of global warming is not supported by science. … that its arguments against global warming were backed by scientists, academics,


  13. BOB MCGILL says:…/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstrea…‎Cached
    SimilarWikipediaLoading…(see also Scientific opinion on climate change and Surveys of scientists’ views on climate change). ….. “Professor denies global warming theory”. “[Global …


  14. whungerford says:

    Sadly Bob, the number of articles you find that make false claims, however many, hardly buttresses your case. In any case, Rep. Labrador’s belief sets him at odds with many of his fellows in Congress.


  15. Deb meeker says:

    Boehner has already broken the Hastert rule more than once. The last time being raising the debt ceiling. I agree that a minority faction Speaker would be worse, but Boehner has been a disaster. I don’t even think Boehner has worked for the Republican party’s interest, by allowing nothing of consequence to be voted on, he has led the least effective and damaging two Congressional terms the country has known.


  16. BOB McGILL says:

    Remember my cousin that I told you about, the one that worked at Woods Hole NOI. Well he told me the Russians were trying to warm the planet back in the 1960s’ There is even a treaty not to use the weather as a weapon, during the Vietnam war.
    SORRY but I have a 50 year headstart on this one !


  17. whungerford says:

    That Speaker Boehner ignored the Hastert rule when he had to is to his credit. It cost him with the wacko-birds.

    Boehner is an expert on what’s good for his party. He must feel avoiding a split is paramount. We are unlikely to see a Speaker we like better as long as Republicans are in the majority, but we could see one we like less.


  18. BOB MCGILL says:

    You continue to attempt to reject my comments based solely on nothing more than pure arrogance.

    In 1994 the Air Force revealed its Spacecast 2020 master plan which includes weather control. Scientists have experimented with weather control since the 1940’s, but Spacecast 2020 noted that “using environmental modification techniques to destroy, damage or injure another state are prohibited”. Having said that, the Air Force claimed that advances in technology “compels a reexamination of this sensitive and potentially risky topic.”


  19. whungerford says:

    Better not go out without your tin hat, Bob.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.