Reed’s ‘NV’ on the Violence Against Women Reauthorization

Last Thursday, the House passed the Senate version of the Violence Against Women Reauthorization (S. 47), clearing the legislation for the President’s signature.

S. 47 is a very progressive bill, including titles on enhancing judicial and law enforcement tools to combat violence against women; improving services for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking; and services, protection, and justice for young victims of violence.

The large majority of Republicans – 138 —  voted against S. 47, and just 87 voted in favor. Every Democrat in the chamber, 199, all told, voted in favor, allowing the bill to pass.

Our own Congressman, Rep. Tom Reed, sent out an email to his constituents at 10:09 a.m. saying:

“Today, the House is scheduled to vote on the Senate’s version of the Violence Against Women Act. I support that version. Two weeks ago, I signed onto a letter urging House leadership to move to reauthorize VAWA – this is long overdue. I am glad the House is going to consider the Senate’s version of the bill so that we can move forward in ensuring the programs VAWA supports can continue protecting America’s women.”

This was very welcome news, particularly because S. 47 extends protections and benefits of VAWA to what the bill refers to as “underserved populations.”

One has to burrow well down into the text of the bill to find the following definition:

“The term ‘underserved populations’ means populations who face barriers in accessing and using victim services, and includes populations underserved because of geographic location, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, underserved racial and ethnic populations, populations underserved because of special needs (such as language barriers, disabilities, alienage status, or age), and any other population determined to be underserved by the Attorney General or by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, as appropriate.”

So here was Rep. Reed on the morning of the vote favoring legislation that would really help out the disadvantaged, including immigrants and the LGBT community. Hallelujah!

Unfortunately, when the vote itself rolled around at 11:56 a.m., Rep. Reed was recorded as “not voting.” Illness was the cause, he later explained. What a shame that our congressman missed this chance to go on record with a vote to protect those who have suffered discrimination, and the less fortunate.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Reed’s ‘NV’ on the Violence Against Women Reauthorization

  1. whungerford says:

    I think we should give Rep. Reed credit for his stated support of the VAWA. This represents a welcome change in his thinking whatever his motivation. Rep. Reed did explain his view on VAWA, and that too is also welcome. Rep. Reed recently offered to keep his constituents informed of developments in the Capitol, and it would be good if he would keep that promise. It would be especially good if he would explain his honest opinion rather than GOP talking points.

    Like

  2. josephurban says:

    I have been observing this guy for years. Reed disappears as soon as he is re-elected. Then he votes for 1.5 years according to the radical right wing and corporate agendas. Then election time draws near. And a different Reed emerges. Like a beautiful butterfly emerging from what was once an ugly caterpillar. He is temporarily transformed into a “moderate”. Until the day after the election. Then it is back to the larvae stage. Don’t be fooled.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.