Rep. Reed is an Extremist When It Comes To The Environment!

Political Score Cards are ways that Special Interest Groups rate how government officials agree with their agendas. There are many of them. Their range follows the political spectrum–from the far left to the far right–and most points between.

Recently, the League of Conservation Voters (LCV) published their Political Score Card on the Second Session of the 112th Congress. The League examines our leaders voting record on the following Conservational Issues: The Clean Air Act, Clean Energy, Clean Water, Global Warming, Hardrock Mining, Holding Big Oil Accountable, Open Spaces, Toxic Chemicals, Transportation, and Wildlife. Occasionally some votes fall in an “Other” category.

Using the LCV’s environmental friendly agenda, our congressman, Rep. Tom Reed scored pretty low. Matter of fact, Rep. Reed and Rep. Buerkle were the only New Yorkers in the League’s “House Below 5% Club”. His 2012 score on voting for the Conservational way of thinking was 3%. His lifetime (2 years) score is 9%.  The average House member from New York State was a 65%. The average House member had a score of 42%.  This shows that Rep. Reed is at the EXTREME edge of the House of Representatives when it comes to our environment! He is out of step with the rest of the New York delegation.

Knowing Rep. Reed’s feelings on giving tax breaks and deregulating industries–including the gas and oil industry, his ardent belief that hydrofracking is safe for our environment and drinking water (even though New York State hasn’t drawn that conclusion after years of research), and that he is a leader of the House Natural Gas Caucus, it isn’t surprising that he has received dismal scores on Clean Water (2 out of 25 votes) and Holding Big Oil Accountable (0 out of 8, plus one “Missed Vote”). But why is it low in the other areas? The good news about Rep. Reed is as of now, he has a 100% rating for his 2013 votes! He is 2 for 2 through his two votes supporting funding for Hurricane Sandy Relief.

Questions arise when digging into the details. I would really like to know why he voted for a National Flood Insurance bill in 2011, but voted AGAINST a similar bill in 2012. Not only did he vote against it, he was one of only 18 House members who voted against it. The bill had massive bipartisan support, it passed 402-18! (Another EXTREME, far Right Vote) Why did he vote against it–especially since he was for it a year earlier?

If you are a real political junkie, studying Political Score Cards could dominate your time. The Project Vote Smart Organization–a group that gives un-bias information about  candidates, has a large data base of Political Score Cards. A listing of these, along with how our congressman rates in each of the can be found on the Project Vote Smart website.  All other Senators and Representatives’ ratings can also be found at the Project Vote Smart website. 

About pystew

Retired Teacher, political science geek, village trustee. I lean a little left, but like a good political discussion. My blog, the New NY 23rd (http://newny23rd) is about discussing the issues facing the people of our new congressional district. Let's hear all sides of the issues, not just what the candidates want us to hear.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Rep. Reed is an Extremist When It Comes To The Environment!

  1. whungerford says:

    This and similar surveys may be misleading: rather than measure Rep. Reed’s commitment to a healthy environment they may simply reflect his political association. He may see these key votes not so much as environmental issues, but as challenges from his political enemies: liberals, business-bashers and tree-huggers. Rep. Reed moved slightly and surprisingly when he said he opposed fracking near the Finger Lakes. I believe he did this because his commitment to supporters in the local wine business trumped his links to energy companies. Thus environmentalists would do well to focus on specific dangers like the dairy industry’s need for clean water especially when business is threatened rather than sweeping demands like ban fracking that serve only to get Reed’s back up.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.